Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!
Is there a built-in tool in OS X (Tiger) or a free utility I can download for batch changing file extensions? We've got several hundred MP4 files with a mix of .mp4, .mov, and no extensions that ALL need to have .mp4 attached before we can send them to the client.
It seems like something Automater should be able to do, but I've never used it before. Worst case scenario is I spend the rest of the day renaming them manually, but I'd really rather not if I can avoid it.
You should be able to do that easily at the command line.
Um, my caffeine hasn't kicked in yet - anyone else want to try?
eta: I googled - this might help: Batch File Rename By File Extension in Unix
for example:
#change .html files to php
for file in *.html ; do mv $file `echo $file | sed 's/(.*.)html/1php/'` ; done
You'll probably want to backup the files first....
$200 laptop: [link]
In Japan. An "English" version "could hit the streets 'as early as August this year.'"
Thanks guys - I figured out how to do it in Automater, though.
I'm not a lawyer, but my understanding of the legal system is that you are supposed to disclose the major points of your case during the pretrial phase in order to ensure that everyone gets a fair trail. If the defense fails to disclose any aspect of their case the prosecution can assume it won't come up in the trial.
I'm not a lawyer, but my understanding of the legal system is that you are supposed to disclose the major points of your case during the pretrial phase in order to ensure that everyone gets a fair trail. If the defense fails to disclose any aspect of their case the prosecution can assume it won't come up in the trial.
Not exactly. In criminal cases the prosecution has to disclose exculpatory material, but other than that the extent to which they have to share information before trial is up to the court. Generally, though, the court will require that a party intending to use an expert should make significant disclosures about what the expert tested, what it will testify to, and what materials it reviewed, so that the other party can prepare adequately. But aside from the procedures of individual judges/courts, a defendant is not entitled to know what evidence the prosecution has against him and neither is the prosecution entitled to know the details of the defense before trial. Civil trials are more disclosure-oriented, though.
Steve Jobs keynote in 20 minutes! Woo!
Here are the tabs I have open in my browser: [link]
[link]
[link]
[link]
[link]
Steve Jobs keynote in 20 minutes!
Any bets on the "oh, and another thing...." portion of the afternoon's entertainment?
(I'm guessing Act I is iPhone and Act II is Leopard, but there's always an "oh, and another thing...")