Harrow: You didn't have to wound that man. Mal: Yeah, I know, it was just funny.

'Shindig'


Buffistechnology 3: "Press Some Buttons, See What Happens."

Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!


Vortex - May 28, 2011 9:56:43 pm PDT #16826 of 25501
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman

I was thinking about this: [link]


Typo Boy - May 28, 2011 10:34:51 pm PDT #16827 of 25501
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.

Is 2 Gig of Ram enough for Window 7 home premium? I think performance would really suck in ways that would affect usability, like random long pauses and freezes while you are doing stuff.


Typo Boy - May 28, 2011 10:36:23 pm PDT #16828 of 25501
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.

Maybe you could downgrade it to xp or Linux. Either would get really good performance on those specs.


meara - May 28, 2011 11:26:33 pm PDT #16829 of 25501

Ooh! That convertible tablet is totally what I want it to be! Except I want apple to make one (and they're not going to). But I basically want the macbook air to be a touchscreen and fold both ways.


dcp - May 29, 2011 7:00:34 am PDT #16830 of 25501
The more I learn, the more I realize how little I know.

Vortex, I've had this for traveling with since last summer, and it has worked out very well. The keyboard is a little cramped -- it takes me a day or so to make the adjustment from my regular full-sized keyboard, but after that it's all good.

I got this instead of a netbook for three reasons: 1) screen size, 2) keyboard size -- the netbook keyboards were just too cramped, and 3) 4Gb RAM, plus an SD card slot I can use for quick expansion if I really need to.


Steph L. - May 31, 2011 12:23:27 pm PDT #16831 of 25501
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

Okay, I love the new MacBook Pro, but I *loathe* iPhoto '11. When you edit a photo in an external editor (like any iteration of Photoshop, for instance), iPhoto immediately makes a duplicate of your original photo and then keeps it in the iPhoto finder window, next to the edited version. Not only does this bloat the hell out of my photo library (I edit almost all my photos), but visually it's a fucking nightmare. It's not user-friendly at all.

Any Mac users who manage their photos in something other than the shambling horror that is iPhoto '11 -- what do you use?

I'm thinking of just using the Finder and manually managing a hierarchy of folders. And opening things in Preview when I want to just look at them.

(Apparently iPhoto '09 was bad but didn't do this duplication thing. Well, it *did,* but it just stowed the duplicates in folders but didn't make them appear in the iPhoto window. But since I kept the trusty iBook for 6 years, I jumped from iPhoto '05 [or possibly '06] right to this nonsense. I'm half-tempted to see if I can kludge iPhoto '05 onto the MBP.)


le nubian - May 31, 2011 12:46:20 pm PDT #16832 of 25501
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."

I don't use Iphoto at all. Anything I need to do (which is 100% rotation and cropping), I do in Preview.

Do you have an iphone or ipad? The Photosync app is cheap and a marvel.


Steph L. - May 31, 2011 1:26:49 pm PDT #16833 of 25501
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

When you import photos, do you just import them into folders, in a hierarchy/structure that works for you? (Versus when I import into iPhoto, it creates folders by date, but in iPhoto '11, they're arcane and EXTREMELY difficult to navigate. There's a whole structure thing going on there that I can't even comprehend. Someone actually wrote the software to do what it does. That boggles.)

I edit my stuff in Photoshop, but I really liked the old iPhoto (as it turns out, it's iPhoto '05) for organizing them visually.

Kind of the way iTunes has gotten more and more complex (some would say needlessly so), apparently so has iPhoto. Big ol' dislike here.

I have an iPod Touch, which I'm assuming I can use the Photosync app on. I'll go check it out.


le nubian - May 31, 2011 1:43:15 pm PDT #16834 of 25501
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."

You have much more complicated needs for photos than I do because I barely use the photo function except for wallpapers and screenshots. So I import them to the mac, manipulate them as I need to and them send them off somewhere. I am not keeping most of the photos. So I don't need an organizing scheme of any note.

I do put them in folders for small projects, but I don't need more than that.

But yes, my photos are organized the way photosync does it, by name of ios device in the photosync folder in Photos. If you want, you can have photosync use Iphoto or something else, but I'm find with the Finder.


§ ita § - May 31, 2011 1:51:25 pm PDT #16835 of 25501
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I use Picasa for my photo management needs, and have it call up Gimp if I need to go very flashy. It's handling thousands and thousands of pictures very easily--categorisation is a flash with the facial recognition.