How do you get rid of the folders of OS uninstall info in Windows XP? I'm pretty sure I'm not rolling back 95% of it, ever, and I'm looking desperately for space on my C drive.
Lorne ,'Smile Time'
Buffistechnology 3: "Press Some Buttons, See What Happens."
Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!
More questions--man, I'm having a troublesome May.
I have a dual monitor setup (nVidia Quadro, HP L1940T, Dell 2001FP), but the system insisted on setting both monitors to the same resolution. Because I'm pretty sure it doesn't have to be that way (ran 2048x1536 and 1400xwhatever at last job), I decided to uninstall the drivers and start from the beginning. The nVidia nView looked especially problematic.
Is it possible to install your monitors before the card? When I click through to Advanced it shows me Default Monitor and no way to install drivers.
Or maybe it's the 2001FP driver set--there are three files (INF, CAT, and ICM) and I can't follow their instructions since I can't install drivers from the Driver tab. I try doubleclicking on the INF file, nada. I try Add Hardware from the Control Panel, and that location doesn't contain information about my hardware.
Right now I'm running singleheaded on the HP monitor, and it's the same deal. No indication that it found new hardware, and the list of resolutions supported is independent of the monitor's actual ability.
Googling is of indeterminate use so far, although I'm iterating through various possible useful search terms.
Any tips?
Huh. I kinda did the equivalent of pressing some (more) buttons and, apart from having my task bar and desktop icons on the right hand monitor and displaying the wallpaper at 1280x1024 on the 1600x monitor, it seems to be behaving.
Which means I'm free to buy that Sandisk thumb drive and work out how to expand my C drive at homeget back to work.
So, am seriously getting impatient for getting a new phone. But need advice from those of you with smartphones.
I've looked at the various options from the various companies, and can see advantages to all of them, really. So I'm wondering about the companies--I've had Sprint for eons, and have generally been happy enough with their service. But I haven't used data, only voice and texting.
Besides voice calls, I want texting and websurfing. I don't need corporate email (ours is some offbrand antiquated system anyway, so even if I wanted it, I might be SOL!). All the companies have various data plans, and I am v. confused. Who's got a recommendation? What's cheap? How much internet would I really use? (Some of the plans are by MB, and I"m like "How the hell do I know what I'd use?"--probably not a lot, as I'm usually near an actual computer, but...)
Plans by MB tend to be scary, in my opinion. It's very easy to accidentally go over and then they charge you a bajillion trillion dollars.
I just looked at Sprint's plans. I've heard good things about their data speed and capabilities, actually - I never considered them or Verizon because I like the idea of GSM phones with SIM cards, but that's a choice not too many people seem to care much about. It appears that the cheapest data plan ("Power Vision Access" or some rigmarole) would include unlimited browsing on your phone, and it's $15 a month. Not half bad! Much better than you can get on Cingular. Where they try to take your money is if you use the phone as a modem for your laptop - they want $40 a month for that.
T-Mobile is still cheaper, though. They have several plans that seem to offer the same thing, but the simple fact is that you can use the cheapest plan ($6.95 a month for "T-Zones T-Mobile Web") to do pretty much everything. Including using it as a bluetooth modem for your laptop, at pretty decent speeds. I do this regularly at school, when I'm trying to visit pages blocked by the educational censoring software on the wireless. T-Mobile, however, has the most complaints I've heard of any network in terms of service - their network is a less extensive than most. I don't have any trouble in NYC, but I certainly didn't get service at my house in Tupelo, MS, and ND had issues in L.A. as well. So that's something to consider.
As to the phone itself - I really like Treos. Blackberries usually come with their own data plan that might be more expensive ($20 a month on T-Mobile) but are pretty and have a nice interface. Windows Mobile pisses me off, but that's as much because they won't let you install software on them from a Mac as anything else. Sidekicks are cool, if a bit ghettofied (and also have their own T-Mobile plans). Basically, nothing is perfect, yet - I have hopes for the second or third-gen iPhone, personally, but that will be a while, and my Treo 680 will hopefully serve me until then.
I've heard bad things about Treo hardware reliability--the people I know here who have them liked them about 3 phones in, when they got one that was solid.
I lost a couple of 650s to hardware issues. But both of my 680s have been perfectly behaved - I only moved to number two because I dropped number one down a flight of concrete stairs, which is hardly the phone's fault.
Yeah, my girlfriend has a Treo through her work, and she said they've had lots of issues with the more recent ones (hers is an older version). But I do like the Treos. I'm tempted by the Sidekick, but a little sketched by T-Mobile's possible connectivity issues--granted, I usually travel only to big cities for work, but I need phone access when I do, so....
Probably wouldn't use the phone tethered--if I'm somewhere comfy enough to haul out the laptop, I'd probably go somewhere with wifi.
t edit: yeah, and is cingular just v. expensive? or is there a cheap plan? I get so confused by the proliferation of data plans available on their websites, but god knows I don't trust the people working at their stores...
I've heard bad things about Treo hardware reliability--the people I know here who have them liked them about 3 phones in, when they got one that was solid.
What finally drove me away from the land of Treos was the OS. The Palm OS just is not designed to multitask. I was getting pretty consistent lock ups and crashes if I was in my email or browser and the phone rang. Nothing like the phone locking up when I'm trying to answer a business call and then having to wait while the whole thing reboots before I can call back. Working freelance that was just not acceptable.
Interesting. Because I've heard people staying away from the Windows Mobile devices because their memory management was so poor--and it was around the multi-tasking.