Yeah, I tend to go with the close-enough shorthand a lot of the time because I'm usually dealing with a list of thousands and that one 0.000023 difference I don't care about. And the stupid*&#$*#! code I inherited is...well, stupid.
Natter 47: My Brilliance Is Wasted On You People
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Whoot! Now bon bon's rank on the list of awesome people I know has edged up a notch.
See how I made that all about me? It's a gift.
Thanks, sara. Good info.
I'm very surprised that the median age for females getting married in 1890 is so high. In my genealogy, most of the girls at that time period were married before 20.
edit: Unless that figure is counting all marriages, which includes widows remarrying.
Congrats bon bon!
I am now off to buy plastic hangers and see if I can find a usably slim light bulb that will still fit the socket of my hanging lamp.
Why am I impersonating computer support?! I am not computer support! Ask the guy sitting next to me!
(The problem is, they don't tend to explain stuff unless you corner them. And I'm being used as a proxy. Kind of annoying.)
they don't tend to explain stuff unless you corner them
It preservers our air of mystery.
It preservers our air of mystery.
It makes everyone here hate them, frankly.
It makes everyone here hate them, frankly.
Hate, fear, it's all the same to the techies.
Unless that figure is counting all marriages, which includes widows remarrying.
Nope--it's age at first marriage.