More info:
The video for The Joker is, as you’d expect for Fatboy Slim, very special indeed. Jon Watts returns after the success of his Wonderful Night video to direct hundreds of kittens in a rights of passage tale…it has to be seen to be believed.
You know, it's funny. We went to war never looking to come back, but it's the real world I couldn't survive.
Tracy ,'The Message'
Natter 47: My Brilliance Is Wasted On You People
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
tommyrot - Oct 17, 2006 6:56:15 am PDT #3942 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
Sue - Oct 17, 2006 6:58:50 am PDT #3943 of 10001
hip deep in pie
The Fatboy Slim video looked too professional (and expensive) to be done by some woman on the Internet. I think she's just a framing device, not a real person.
I totally made that assumption too.
bon bon - Oct 17, 2006 7:12:27 am PDT #3944 of 10001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
Thanks for the congrats, guys. I was totes shocked by the thing.
ION, why must Neurology be *impossible* to search?
§ ita § - Oct 17, 2006 7:13:43 am PDT #3945 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
It's a bit of a shame, but I totally don't care for the cover of the song. Not enough to watch the video twice.
Jesse - Oct 17, 2006 7:17:40 am PDT #3946 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
I just emailed someone asking a question that I immediately found the answer to via Google. I am now rolling my eyes forever at myself.
Also, and I'm not even congested, but I swear my nose is whistling when I breathe. Ew.
§ ita § - Oct 17, 2006 7:20:03 am PDT #3947 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Hmm. I've been operating on the assumption that a 2-4 year age difference (guy older than chick) is normal for Western society. Well, at least in the places I've lived, and for married couples.
I realise that my generation might be mucking things up a bit, but it certainly held for my parents.
Am I on crack? Have things changed for my generation? I haven't even sat down and tried to work out how to google for those stats yet.
AirstreamNA - Oct 17, 2006 7:21:06 am PDT #3948 of 10001
When you're racing - it's life. Anything that comes before or after is just waiting.
Congrats bon bon. What specifically are you searching for in regards to neurology? I might be able to help you narrow down your search.
sarameg - Oct 17, 2006 7:26:55 am PDT #3949 of 10001
Am I on crack? Have things changed for my generation? I haven't even sat down and tried to work out how to google for those stats yet.
I don't think so. If you look at the median age for marriage, for men it is a couple years older than for women, so while that doesn't describe every couple, it implies a trend. I found this : [link]
Jesse - Oct 17, 2006 7:29:18 am PDT #3950 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Wow, that's really interesting. I'm especially fascinated that they were so young in the 60s and 70s. I mean, I guess people I know who got married then were that young, but I wouldn't have thought the average ages would have been older earlier.
Connie Neil - Oct 17, 2006 7:31:14 am PDT #3951 of 10001
brillig
What does "median" mean again in stats?