Bester: Mal. Whaddya need two mechanics for? Mal: I really don't.

'Out Of Gas'


Spike's Bitches 32: I think I'm sobering up.  

[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.


brenda m - Sep 19, 2006 7:57:30 am PDT #3775 of 10000
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

Yay! Not the only one who immediately went "TRIANGLE TRIANGLE TRIANGLE." My inner socio-economic history geek is vindicated. Okay, maybe it's not very inner.


Nora Deirdre - Sep 19, 2006 8:01:30 am PDT #3776 of 10000
I’m responsible for my own happiness? I can’t even be responsible for my own breakfast! (Bojack Horseman)

eta: or, if you find me the number, I'll call.

Really? Here's the site with the #. It looks like the right dept...

[link]

I'm sorry for so eagerly taking you up on your offer, I am a phone wuss.


Aims - Sep 19, 2006 8:03:30 am PDT #3777 of 10000
Shit's all sorts of different now.

Vortex has been chomping to make a lawerly phone call for one of us for awhile now.


Vortex - Sep 19, 2006 8:05:53 am PDT #3778 of 10000
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman

I wouldn't say chomping but i'm a little hurt that no one has taken me up on it.


Nora Deirdre - Sep 19, 2006 8:07:21 am PDT #3779 of 10000
I’m responsible for my own happiness? I can’t even be responsible for my own breakfast! (Bojack Horseman)

I will always take a lawyer up on an offer to talk lawyerly to someone so I don't have to.


erikaj - Sep 19, 2006 8:08:49 am PDT #3780 of 10000
Always Anti-fascist!

Better morning this morning. Even woke up in time for "die, you bastard, die!" on Homicide reruns. I find that funny enough I should have been murder police.(My mother also listed it as her top TV moment...) And Kay sees a ghost. Good times. I should write another Howard/AtS fic, huh?ETA: One of these days, Vortex.


Topic!Cindy - Sep 19, 2006 8:12:04 am PDT #3781 of 10000
What is even happening?

1) They HAVE to take off holidays but they HAVE to use their vacation time to do so.

How can that be legal? I don't think it is.

Nora, probably they didn't do a good job of explaining this. When I first worked for MGH, we had different kinds of time: Vacation, sick time, scheduled holidays, floating holidays, personal days.

After a few years, they revamped the whole shebang. They took away all those kinds of leave, and we just had one type of time: Earned time.

We earned (something like) 2.5 hours per week, and then that time was deducted any time we were off, be it sick, vacation or (scheduled) holidays.

If you were never sick, it was cool, because you could take what amounted to extra vacation. If you were sick with a lengthy illness, it was cool, because you could dip into your vacation time.

The holidays got deducted from the earned time, but they were figured into how much we earned per week, in the first place.


Cashmere - Sep 19, 2006 8:12:07 am PDT #3782 of 10000
Now tagless for your comfort.

I'm assuming they have fire evacuation plans for emergencies in the locked building. And I understand why they would physically lock down a building with the program for abusive parents with supervised visitation. However--those offices shouldn't be sharing a building with another office! It's unfair to the other office workers being on lock down and it INCREASES security risks if you have other people besides program participants trying to leave or get into the building or otherwise getting aroud the lock down procedures.

That's just fucking stupid.

I'm vibing for Fay and hoping to hear from her.


WindSparrow - Sep 19, 2006 8:12:11 am PDT #3783 of 10000
Love is stronger than death and harder than sorrow. Those who practice it are fierce like the light of stars traveling eons to pierce the night.

What about the standard 15 min. break for every four hours worked, plus at least 30 min. for lunch if you're there for six hours? Is it legal to require workers to smoosh their 15 min. together to form a lunch break, and therefore have no coffee breaks in a, say, nine hour day?


Vortex - Sep 19, 2006 8:12:39 am PDT #3784 of 10000
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman

Okay, I have bad news. The guy at the attorney general's office (617-727-3465) told me that vacation time and use is at the discretion of the employer. When I specifically asked if the employer could require the employee to use the day, he said yes. I then asked if the employee had the option to not be paid for the day (as opposed to taking the day), and he said that it was at the discretion of the employer.

I asked for a cite, and he gave me Ch. 149, section 148. I had already looked at the section, and did not see anything that I thought applicable. I'm a little rusty, so could one of the other lawyer people take a look and see if they think it applies? [link]

And for God's sake, Mass legislators, learn to use a period! The first 3/4 of the damn page is one run on sentence!!