Sorry. I'm just a little touchy on that count because the main reason it took me so long to start writing again after the project I dropped in 1997 was that I believed all the writing advice books that said if it wasn't a compulsion for you, then you probably weren't really a writer and therefore shouldn't bother.

Do they really say that? Good grief. Again, glad I don't read the things.

I don't think they mean by compulsion what I mean by compulsion. It smells as if they're trying to convince themselves (or us) that it's some kind of Higher Calling, or something.

I don't know about that. When the musician in me needs to play, I do that, because at that moment in time, it's what I'm happiest doing. And when the storyteller in me has something to tell, that's what I do.

Is that compulsion? It certainly isn't constant.

Angels and Demons sucked soi hard I was a complete bitch and wrote at Amazon that I would avoid Dan Brown's work like it had anthrax inside. And that my mother bought it for a quarter and she still overpaid. In my world, he's the lackey assigned to scrub Pelecanos' CD collection. Pulls Dennis Lehane's wheelbarrow and buys Deb's cat litter. Wonder who he's blowing.(But how do I feel?) Compulsion...hmm, if I didn't I'd hurt people...I'd say that counts. Also the fact that I was in preschool making my my mom take my dictation and thinking she didn't do it right...that points to a certain innateness. But I did back away for quite a few years thinking I was doing something more "real"

There are stories in my head. Sometimes they get written down, sometimes they don't. After my father died in '82, I shut down for a long time in a fit of "rather childish, isn't it?" But the stories didn't shut up. I had to start writing again just to relieve the mental pressure.

I've always wondered at the difference between "writing is words on paper/electronic media" and "writing as a fully coherent set of thoughts that could be transferred to a more permanent mode whenever you want." Sort of like your brain being a hard drive with its own collection of documents. If you're still constructing stories in your head that have more structure than merely daydreams, then you're coming a little close to writing. To my mind.

From Christmas until the anniversary of my dad's death (Feb. 6, 2003), I can't write squat. After that, it slowly returns. Last year, it bothered me. This year, I realized what was going on fairly quickly, and didn't even bother to try or worry. I was fairly sure it would wear off, and it does.

eta...

It seems to linger a bit 'til our birthdays have passed (early March).

How does crap writing like that make the bloody best-seller list? HOW?!?

I told you all, didn't I, about the paperback I picked up in a funk in the middle of January? The hero's "eyes were the color of a dark gray sky." Ummmm, I wonder what color a dark gray sky is?? That was page 2.

Yesterday I picked up a Vonda McIntyre novel, read the first page (which, being the first page, was actually only half a page) and found two similar instances of verbal clumsiness. So, I put it down again. Sometimes I can get past that kind of problem and get into the story, but sometimes I just can't.

I'm a fan of adverbs. There is a whole song about adverbs, you know. It's the L-Y song. Sample verse: You walk into a darkened room, / and sitting there in the gloom / is a TIGER. How do you say goodbye? (Answer: immediately.)

Angels and Demons sucked soi hard I was a complete bitch and wrote at Amazon that I would avoid Dan Brown's work like it had anthrax inside. And that my mother bought it for a quarter and she still overpaid.

Oh, man. I'm trying to read it, and the topic could be very very interesting in the hands of a skilled writer (I'd love to see Deb or Connie take on the Illuminati), but it's SO BAD.

I'd love to see Deb or Connie take on the Illuminati

She lumped me in with Deb. I love Teppy.

The Illuminati are way cool, and the whole Holy Grail Holy Blood thing was my favorite conspiracy until it got fashionable. I've got all sorts of books about the Knights Templars and the cult of Mary Magdalene and the Illuminati. I'm not persuaded by any of the conclusions of the books, but I admit there are some intriguing possibilities in the evidence.

I use them, rather a lot, in dialogue. Not attached to a said, but within a speech pattern, for specific characters

I think when writing books are anti-adverb, what they tend to mean is to get rid of all the "said thuslies." Not the places where it's a character tic, as Deb describes, or used otherwise used to good effect.

And I do think "Dan said" or "Thom said" is helpful, not after every single sentence, but when a passage is like this --

"I can't go to your sister's wedding with you," he said.
"You have to, you promised," she said.
"I never. If I did, I lied."
"You're impossible."
"But that's why you love me."
"Who said anything about love?"
"I seem to remember certain murmurs to that effect."
"Well, if I said that I lied."
"Now who's impossible?"
"Still you, sorry."
"If I am, you are too."
"Am not."
"Are too."
"Am not am not am not."
"Are too are too are too, infinity."

And on and on and on, I need *something,* or else I'm going to start needing to count back to figure out who's calling who impossible. And if I have to do that, you've lost me, at least for the scene.

I tend to use a lot of dialogue tags for this reason.

I'm going to start needing to count back to figure out who's calling who impossible

The unabridged "Count of Monte Cristo" I have does this a lot, a full page of snappy dialogue with no attribution. I got off-track and was getting very confused about who was the closet Bonapartist and who was the anal-retentive, self-serving Royalist until I counted back.

Lack of balance is the real problem with writers guides. It's why I adore "Telling Lies" so much. His philosophy pretty much is, "Are you telling a good story? Are people eager to find out what happens next? Then don't worry about it."