Heh. Brynn, I was about to comment - that's a charming piece of work, there. One word is puzzling me, though: the mention of "our" reduced lives. Everything else in the piece is at a distance, so was that sudden inclusion of self deliberate or accidental?
The Great Write Way
A place for Buffistas to discuss, beta and otherwise deal and dish on their non-fan fiction projects.
Deb Hmm. I didn't even realize I did that. Probably, I missed it when I was converting the perspective from a first person memory piece, since distance seemed more fitting. I could cut the "our" having it read "to sustain reduced lives" instead? Now I'm noticing weird comma stuff. Not usually a comma gal, but I think I'm wordy and the drabble format has me doing a bit of syntactical contortion to fit everything in.
Sure, DG, that will teach me to be flippant.
I think I was referring to that editor who is not real, the one that lives in the mind of the first-time writer, the one who stomps on every word choice and scene setting.
That editor can bite me.
The distinction between input from the editor you describe and input from a writer's group (situated anywhere) must be readily apparent, no?
That editor can bite me.
Dude. The one in the head, who tries to eat newbies?
Should be killed on sight. I'm with you.
The meatspace editor who not only knows what they're doing, but who respects the work and the voice?
Anything he or she wants. Dancing girls, groupies, cocaine, chocolate, anything at all.
OK, that Editor, Station manager at KFKD. Bitch.
And then there's my crew, with the machetes and the weedwhackers. Love them.
I think we call Gus's version of an editor a superego.
The other kind does not fall into a Freudian category.
I think you're right, Nutty.
What is the Freudian category for "Mom"?
Electra notwithstanding?
I dont think that guy liked mothers, so much.
Sometimes the desire to simultaneously strangle and have sex with one's mama is just a cigar...