Spike: Lots of fuss over one girl. Other things to do around here--important things. Angel: You know that whoosh thing you do when you're suddenly not there anymore? I love that.

'Unleashed'


Natter 46: The FIGHTIN' 46  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Gudanov - Sep 21, 2006 7:45:55 am PDT #9451 of 10001
Coding and Sleeping

Ack shrift, I'm sorry the job situation is not going well. I wish I knew somebody in Chicago who could help.

I'd like to vote no on making Chavez an honorary Buffistas. He is too authoritarian, has accomplished little against poverty in Venezuela depite his rhetoric, and had a questionable election. Also, I'm not a Bush fan, but I don't like Chavez's over the top accusations and general anti-American stance.


tommyrot - Sep 21, 2006 7:50:44 am PDT #9452 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Humans? Over-recognising the human face? Now there's a shocker.

Speaking of which....

Often times skeptics talk about people who have paranormal beliefs as seeing patterns that aren't necessarily there. We even have a word for it, pareidolia (which I invariably have to look up the spelling for). This seems to make sense because our neocortex is an incredibly powerful pattern matching engine. So if some people see patterns more easily in vague or obscure stimuli then that implies there is something different going on in their brains.

This 2002 article from New Scientist magazine reports on research conducted by Dr. Peter Brugger at University Hospital in Zurich. Using a group of 20 self-described "believers" (I wonder exactly what they believed in) and 20 self-described skeptics he asked each group to distinguish between scrambled images of faces and images of actual faces flashed upon a screen. A second trial asked the two groups to tell real words from nonsense words. As you might expect, the believers were much more likely to see a face or a word where there wasn't one.

Both groups were then given L-DOPA to increase the levels of dopamine in their brains (L-DOPA is a synthetic precursor to dopamine and is able to cross the blood-brain barrier). This led to both groups making more errors, but it also led to the skeptics being more likely to see the scrambled faces and words as real. Interestingly, the increased levels of dopamine in the believer's brains did not seem to increase the likelihood of their interpreting the spurious data as real which might mean there is a threshold above which more dopamine does not make a difference.

[link]


§ ita § - Sep 21, 2006 7:53:02 am PDT #9453 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I actually enjoy letting my brain "recognise" things. I don't know how to explain it, but I sort of delay paying proper attention, and let my brain guess at what it's seeing (or sometimes hearing). It's quite fascinating at times to compare that to reality.


Gudanov - Sep 21, 2006 7:56:41 am PDT #9454 of 10001
Coding and Sleeping

I've seen quite a few ghost shows on TV where there is somebody who talks about seeing a figure out of the corner of their eye and state that it's a ghost or they are crazy and I just want to reach through the TV and tell them "No, it's normal, it's the way your brain works!".


Gudanov - Sep 21, 2006 7:57:12 am PDT #9455 of 10001
Coding and Sleeping

Happy Birthday Sophia!


tommyrot - Sep 21, 2006 7:57:35 am PDT #9456 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

I actually enjoy letting my brain "recognise" things. I don't know how to explain it, but I sort of delay paying proper attention, and let my brain guess at what it's seeing (or sometimes hearing). It's quite fascinating at times to compare that to reality.

As long as you don't get too pareidolish on us.

OTOH, maybe that would be fun....


shrift - Sep 21, 2006 8:01:16 am PDT #9457 of 10001
"You can't put a price on the joy of not giving a shit." -Zenkitty

shrift, you have a soul now. Unsucked. The rest will happen.

It would be nice if they'd give me an interview before turning me down flat. You know, once a month, at least.

Ack shrift, I'm sorry the job situation is not going well.

I think I need to rewrite my resume. And keep broadening my job search. And apparently go back to school for a Computer Science degree.


§ ita § - Sep 21, 2006 8:03:54 am PDT #9458 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I probably applied for a hundred or so jobs before I got the one I did. I got three interviews in three months, and was offered two. I'm so glad I didn't take the first one.


tommyrot - Sep 21, 2006 8:04:27 am PDT #9459 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

I am linking to this Wonkette entry just because it has a picture of a monkey with a gun: [link]

Although that gun might be too big for that monkey. Also, someone train that monkey how to hold a gun properly - he could get hurt when the shell casing ejects if he fires it like that....


shrift - Sep 21, 2006 8:05:38 am PDT #9460 of 10001
"You can't put a price on the joy of not giving a shit." -Zenkitty

I probably applied for a hundred or so jobs before I got the one I did. I got three interviews in three months, and was offered two.

Well, that makes me feel slightly better, but not by much, since you're a hell of a lot more qualified than I am at just about everything.