SA, you chose wisely.
Kathy, I'd need product for them. I don't know that the first would need a half hour blow out, but it might require some other styling (hot rollers, velcro rollers, or a curling iron) depending on your hair.
(I could, with a comb and some time in the mornings, do #2 with no product no problem, but I have an insane amount of hair.)
I could do #2 but I would need some blow drying (maybe five minutes) and product. I don't have an insane amount of hair, but I have enough wave that my hair generally does what I tell it.
Also, I'm seconding ChiKat's question. When is the last time you used product, and what did you use? There are lots of weightless products now, and generally, if you towel dry and maybe let it air dry for a few, then put the product in (a small amount) and use a blow dryer for a few minutes, you won't end up with that sticky feel, or really--any feel at all. The only sort of products you're going to feel are those you put in after your hair is dry: spray, wax, paste (or if you put in gel or mousse after your hair was dry, I suppose you'd feel them, too).
Actually, I had a thought about something we were perhaps missing from the kink discussionn where things seemed to be veering uncomfortably judgmental for some people. It seems to me that its society's "fucked-up"ness as much, or perhaps more than the individual's, that goes into determining/defining what is "kinky". In fetishland, it's all about the individual. But I think the appeal of the kink doesn't necessarily have to do with internal repression.
Yeah. I ended up abandoning three different comments on the discussion yesterday, because I couldn't find the words I wanted, but brenda, you've hit on it. And actually I don't even think the definition has to get judgmental about society, either. A kink is a deviation from the norm. It's all about numbers. Hec was inserting psychology in the question, when it's really (I think, by definition) a sociological one.
Where and why an individual may deviate is where you could bring in psychology, but that's not what defines the kink. It's a kink if it's unusual. People are early adopters of practices, or adopters of non-standard practices, for all sorts of reasons. Can pathology be one of those reasons? Sure, but it doesn't have to be. Also, I think "twist" rather than "bent" is a better definition, but that's bringing the dictionary back into it.
For the last day or so, I've been confusing this thread and Bitches. We've been talking Swedes and hair over here, and migraines and temp jobs over there. sarameg and msbelle were the only landmarks I had to orient myself, this morning.