Ah. If grouporsection is 1, it's a group. If 2, it's a section. I had it backwards. This has been the cause of much confusion and effort on my part over the last five minutes. (Not counting the portions of those five minutes I've spent here.)
Two steaming cups of chocolate goodness. Courtesy of whomever I swiped it from out of the cupboard.
Ben ,'The Killer In Me'
Natter 46: The FIGHTIN' 46
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
tommyrot - Sep 12, 2006 7:44:16 am PDT #7528 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
§ ita § - Sep 12, 2006 7:44:23 am PDT #7529 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Because then we can have AI make all our comma decisions for us.
No! I need my freedom to choose!
Trudy Booth - Sep 12, 2006 7:45:08 am PDT #7530 of 10001
Greece's financial crisis threatens to take down all of Western civilization - a civilization they themselves founded. A rather tragic irony - which is something they also invented. - Jon Stewart
Do I want a 14.4 inch laptop screen or a 15.4?
The money difference isn't much, but the weight is.
Thoughts?
tommyrot - Sep 12, 2006 7:46:20 am PDT #7531 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
The money difference isn't much, but the weight is.
If you plan to spend a lot of time carrying your laptop about, I'd say get the smaller one. The weight difference becomes more significant the longer you have to carry the thing.
SailAweigh - Sep 12, 2006 7:46:55 am PDT #7532 of 10001
Nana korobi, ya oki. (Fall down seven times, stand up eight.) ~Yuzuru Hanyu/Japanese proverb
Depends on how much you're actually going to carry the laptop around on a daily basis. A lot, I'd go with the 14.4 inch. Just have it to be flexible at home, go with the 15.4 inch.
ETA: inevitable X-post.
Cashmere - Sep 12, 2006 7:47:27 am PDT #7533 of 10001
Now tagless for your comfort.
I really, really hope I never have to see the Audrey Hepburn commercial.
Fred Pete - Sep 12, 2006 7:47:43 am PDT #7534 of 10001
Ann, that's a ferret.
Want to figure out Ohio's former employer liability for intentional torts scheme?
I'm having enough problem with the UCC, thank you.
Aims - Sep 12, 2006 7:48:53 am PDT #7535 of 10001
Shit's all sorts of different now.
is having a hard believing that Trudy isn't buying the bigger one.
wonders about the existence of SPP.
tommyrot - Sep 12, 2006 7:49:58 am PDT #7536 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
is having a hard believing that Trudy isn't buying the bigger one.
I bet she's getting a big hard drive, though.
Aims - Sep 12, 2006 7:50:30 am PDT #7537 of 10001
Shit's all sorts of different now.
My faith is restored.