So, is this for real? [link]
Gotta say, kind of more what I expected to see.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
: This is a parody. A parody. The Asian baby photoshopped into this image is not meant to represent the Asian baby shown in the actual image. The baby in this photo is not Tom Cruise's daughter. As far as we know; the dude gets around. Thank you for your wisdom and understanding.
Typos are not anyone's friend
Hey!
The case of which you are referring...it's(not literally) on the tip of my tongue. Dag. Will wake up thinking of the name tonight, since murder and drugs are my stock in fricking trade on this board.
Heh. Yeah, that disclaimer wasn't there earlier today.
Hey! Let's be fiends!
Or friends, whatever.... friendly fiends even.
Best fiends forever.
It's too bad that the word 'fiend' has fallen out of usage for the most part. 'Coke fiend' is such a cool phrase. I mean, you never hear about crack fiends.
Alright, but I'll have you know, I'm nobody's sidekick.
Eta: I'd be Chuck Norris' sidekick.
Google plans to announce on Wednesday that it is offering a service that will permit Internet users to search through the archives of newspapers, magazines and other publications and uncover material that in some cases dates back more than 200 years.
As a librarian, here's the hurdle I'll have to get my patrons over: The Google service will tell them that the article is available for a price -- not that it's available to them for free because we already subscribe to all the services mentioned as partnering with Google.
But the partnering is very interesting, indeed, since Franklin Pierce did a beta test with the Google Search Appliance, [link]