I'm up to Zodiac, which might possibly be the slowest moving film in the history of motion pictures.
When you mentioned that one, I considered warning you, but I didn't think it would be fair in case you liked that kind of thing. (The person I saw it with loved it--go figure.)
So if I wasn't enamored of
Black Dahlia
I probably won't enjoy
Zodiac
?
Aren't there 2 recent Zodiacs? The one with Gyllenhaal and the slightly earlier Jake-free version?
there's a 2005 movie called
The Zodiac.
I assumed we were talking about the 2007 picture.
I think that's the one with the catfish-mouthed guy from Gray's Anatomy right? It keeps raising and then dashing my hopes when I surf past it on cable.
Somebody said to me the other day Zodiac was the best movie of 2007. The most polite reply I had was "Did you only see one movie this year?".
Don't forget Tyler Perry released like 4 movies this year. It could happen.
So if I wasn't enamored of Black Dahlia I probably won't enjoy Zodiac ?
I've heard they are stylistically and structurally very different (haven't seen either) but that ZODIAC is very...deliberately paced, shall we say. It was one of the reasons I couldn't quite bring myself to see it in the theater (and haven't seen it yet) despite some reviews I read that intrigued me.
So if I wasn't enamored of Black Dahlia I probably won't enjoy Zodiac ?
I had different issues with the two movies. I will say one thing in defense of
Zodiac.
It may have been slower than frozen molasses but, after viewing it, I didn't feel compelled to seek out a synopsis of the movie to figure out what the fuck I just watched.
Black Dahlia
sucked. I'm so over Scarlett Johansson.