Inara: Mal, this isn't the ancient sea. You don't have to go down with your ship. Mal: She ain't going down. She ain't going anywhere.

'Out Of Gas'


The Minearverse 5: Closer to the Earth, Further from the Ax  

[NAFDA] "There will be an occasional happy, so that it might be crushed under the boot of the writer." From Zorro to Angel (including Wonderfalls, The Inside and Drive), this is where Buffistas come to anoint themselves in the bloodbath.


DCJensen - Jun 24, 2006 5:54:18 am PDT #485 of 10001
All is well that ends in pizza.

Andi and I were watching an episode of Jeeves & Wooster this week when Wooster used ankled in describing walking somewhere.

"Ankled down to the club" or some such, but I'm paraphrasing.


Kessie - Jun 24, 2006 11:23:02 am PDT #486 of 10001
The thing about life is :You can rehearse it all you want, But nobody else ever sticks to the script. So why bother?

Ah, right. I knew there were some other catches why I didn´t enter. As for the language, heh. My parents just look at me strangely when I talk like that to POD on the phone. But then again it´s foreign language to them anyway, in more ways than one.

Oh and thanks SailAweigh and Jesse!


sumi - Jun 24, 2006 12:20:50 pm PDT #487 of 10001
Art Crawl!!!

Isn't Variety- speak based on slang from the 1920s?


Matt the Bruins fan - Jun 24, 2006 12:29:16 pm PDT #488 of 10001
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

Imagines Kristen in flapper wear chain-smoking and tossing back drinks in a Prohibition-era speakeasy...


Kessie - Jun 24, 2006 12:34:44 pm PDT #489 of 10001
The thing about life is :You can rehearse it all you want, But nobody else ever sticks to the script. So why bother?

...or in some hotel, sitting alone in a room, trying to come up with a new story, with John Goodman next door.


Betsy HP - Jun 24, 2006 4:54:46 pm PDT #490 of 10001
If I only had a brain...

I want ita in a speakeasy, with a Derringer in her garter.


Allyson - Jun 24, 2006 4:55:53 pm PDT #491 of 10001
Wait, is this real-world child support, where the money goes to buy food for the kids, or MRA fantasyland child support where the women just buy Ferraris and cocaine? -Jessica

A hammer would be funnier.

Allyson, why are you not writing?


sarameg - Jun 24, 2006 6:02:40 pm PDT #492 of 10001

Allyson, because you needed to take a breath. Now go have a nic fit and laugh at the antics of some crazyass people you type to in a glowing box.

PS, Ruby says rub her ears and cater to her every whim. Says Mister Kitty.


Nilly - Jun 25, 2006 6:19:17 am PDT #493 of 10001
Swouncing

Thanks to Kristen (who not only rocks, but gets lots of luck wishes for her contests!), I got to read the script for "Pre Filer". And then, to babble.

And once again, an episode starts with distancing Rebecca from a group that could be hers, this time the students (and Paul, who is with her, and older, so supposedly further away from the students, is closer to them, because he used to be one of them, and probably liked it, too).

Rebecca freaked me out a bit, at the end of the teaser. It was like she was seeing something just enough different than what I was reading, to make it look the-same-but-not, which may be even scarier, to me, than seeing things completely differently. I wonder how it turned out on the actual show.

"He's a profiler. Does what we do" - I loved how it was Web who said this line. Because of the murder element that came along, with the profiler's understanding of the future killings - because Web himself killed, at least one criminal that we know if, in the first episode. And, yeah, the guy that Web killed had already committed at least several crimes, but still.

And then, I loved how it was Web who questioned Rebecca about agreeing with the murderer-of-murderers-to-be approach. After he killed one in front of her. And I loved the description of her hesitation to answer without a careful thought first, because it was Web who asked the question.

Oh, and after the "tell us who we're looking for", when it was the last slide, and it was Rebecca's own shadow on the screen, as if in an answer, to both questions, the direct one and the "do you agree with that?" one, but her spoken words showed a different answer. I really wonder how it looked on the actual show, because reading it was such a lovely - creepy - tapestry.

Oh, so the guy stalking in the car, the gay who fit Rebecca's description of the pre-filer, was "just" a murderer-to-be, to be murdered by the murderers-to-be murderer, before they murdered? OK, this is too complicated to type, I'll stop. But still - at least the way it was read, Havens fit the description of the pre-filer, and it made it even more interesting that it wasn't him. The similarities between victim (who may or may not become a killer), and the actual killer (who wanted - what? To save the victims? To act all FBI? Some of both, or none of the above?). Interesting.

"Danny's grin fades. A chill. Paul holds his look" - there's some history here, right? It's not just the easier-to-pull-a-trigger atmosphere that Danny has all around him, there are actual facts, too, right? And it's really interesting, how, again, the killer-to-be and the man whose job is to stop him share similar characteristics. Would Danny resemble the pre-filer, too? Or would somebody else? Rebecca, who seems to get inside his skin so easily? Web, who already killed instead of bringing to justice? Paul, who seems furthest from all this?

And I love how the "line" continues - Rebecca in the seat of the murder victim, and Web - "he does what we do" - in the seat of the profiler, the actual killer. The one who actually gets inside the head of the maybe-would-be-killer is Rebecca - she even looks through the mirror at Web, behind her, just like the victim could do. And then all the jumps between all three - Rebecca, the maybe-killer-to-be and the pre-filer. Did I mention already that it's creepy?

Oh, and obviously, since one of the crew members may be like the pre-filer, it means that this person may be a future potential serial killer, and therefore the pre-filer has to track that person and try to stop them, as is his way. It spins my head, a bit, with the question of how he may look upon his own handsdoing - wouldn't he hate himself, in a way, too? Because of his method? Or would he just ignore that aspect, that one not-that-tiny difference?

"That's you. - It's him." - I love how such two simple sentences, all of, what, four words and a couple of apostrophes, can be this creepy, in the way they encompass so much meaning inside. Because it's not just the simple facts of who did what and was where and all, it's "you" and "him" on the inside level, as well, right? At least, that's the way my mind's ears heard this being read. (continued...)


Nilly - Jun 25, 2006 6:19:22 am PDT #494 of 10001
Swouncing

( continues...)

Oh, and again with the "which is it" with the family man (and him roaring in a completely innocent manner) - possible victim, possible future killer, just a distraction, none of the above? Oh, and who said it's the man? Couldn't it be his wife, too? I mean, Rebecca is a woman and she seems like the one most in the pre-filer's head, so it's not like there's anything strictly-manly about it, right? And it's interesting that the crew members play along, in the pre-filer's game, according to his rules, with his hints. They just follow the trail he leaves, right?

"I don't even have a joke." - "We put up a forcefield", her coming up with the name of the pre-filer and being proud of it - I love Mel. And I like her conversations with Danny, how the two of them tease each other yet understand each other, work together, agree, in a sense.

Paul thought that Rebecca is looking to show the pre-filer to be correct, that this family - that she was so uncomfortable around - had some dark secret, just like so many other cases they've seen before (remember that girl from "Everything Nice"?). But just when he had thought the darkest about her, she surprises him, from the other side - she wants things to be OK, actually. No matter what admiration she has for the pre-filer's methods, intellect or the like. No matter how many doubts she may or may not have regarding his methods.

I liked the way the pre-filer identified Rebecca's main influences, both Web and Paul, when she talked to him, even though both answers could very well be said by her, too (well, logically, since if these two characters influence her, then it may be because she has a part of them inside herself, too, right?). And how he tried to play with her, with her past, asking to put herself, with her childhood name, on the line.

And once again, it's not just a riddle to be solved, but a very personal story of Rebecca herself - how could she respond to his question about pre-killing her abductor - honestly, and still stick to the system that she's now serving?

Oh, and it's even more personal than just the phone conversation, with Roger possibly hurting little girls, the way Rebecca was hurt in the past?

And what was the cat doing inside the trunk? Was that Audrey's cat, the one that the pre-filer knew to tell her where to look for, so knew it had been missing? And if so, does that mean that he had locked it in Roger's trunk, as a hint, to find his photos? Or something completely different?

And if we're already in an "it's personal" and "it's inside" note, then it made perfect sense that when Kelly said that she was scared, she explained that it was because of her husband, not the murderer running around, who was trying to hurt him. Still chilling, though.

I liked how Rebecca, once she wasn't completely inside her "asking questions" mode, was able to thank Paul for stopping herself, telling him that he was right. Probably suspecting that she's too wrapped up in that case because of her own past history, but still.

They were following the pre-filer's footprints all along. That's how he knew that they would come after him tot he hotel room where Roger was, right? Even the stuff in the trunk, the things that Web went through - is he again playing somebody else's game? With somebody else's rules? Even Web?

"And then we'd all have thought you were a future serial killer" - and I like Danny, too.

"it starts with the mail" - and that's what Web saw, isn't it? What made him figure things out, and go to the post office, and track Marty down? Marty's own complaint about other serial killers is totally about himself, even more than he knows - or maybe, just like he described serial killers, because he wants the drama inside the hint?

And Marty didn't profile only the killers - he profiled Rebecca, too. He knew that making her become distant and professional in front of Marty would bring her back to that judgmental place in which she spoke earlier, with Paul. He's playing them both now. And he's so very creepy. (continued...)