Hey, I loved Crime and Punishment! It taught me that classic books can be just as exciting and interesting as regular books!

I am widely disagreed with, and I'm okay with that, but I find Burton's Hamlet to be breathtakingly awesome. Various things rankle and put people off, including the bare stage, the filming of an unmiked stage performance, the lack of sets and the actors in practice clothes. I found it all amazing. The darkened stage and the actors' black clothing throw their faces and hands into the spotlight, and while not all the actors are equally skilled, I don't think I've ever been more impressed with a portrayal of Hamlet. I also love Hume Cronyn as Polonius. It's a stripped-down version, so if you love period locations, sets, and costumes, if you like lush soundtracks and realistic immersion, this probably isn't the production for you.

If you'd like to concentrate on the book and the actors' performances, Netflix has it.

Bev, I think the first time I ever saw Hamlet performed, it was like that. But not that version. I think it was the one with Kevin Kline.

It taught me that classic books can be just as exciting and interesting as regular books!

Les Miserable and Don Quixote did that for me.

I loved Crime & Punishment, too. And Don Quixote.

The thing I learned most from Branagh's Hamlet is that "damn, Shakespeare really does go over all the major plot points (and his favorites bits of imagery) a half dozen times." (A point which was re-established for me in MacBeth, which goes something like "maybe we should kill the king" "We're going to kill the king" "I'm going to go kill the king right now" "hey! I just killed the king" "OMG, the king is dead." Of course there are a lot of minor plot points that are much less repeated). Also, I don't think anyone over 30 should play Hamlet (maybe up to 35, but it's a push unless they're pretty youthful). It starts playing more like a midlife crisis than the emo prince of Denmark. I have similar opinions, minus about a decade, for Romeo & Juliet.

I read and loved Les Miserables in Jr Hi, but could not get through Don Quixote. It may have been a bad translation, though.

given the time it was written, wasn't 35 middle age back then? I always thought of Hamlet in his early 20s. Kind of like how Ethan Hawke played him.

Yeah. The problem is that it's such a big/prestige part that few young actors have the chops and/or status to get the role.

given the time it was written, wasn't 35 middle age back then? I always thought of Hamlet in his early 20s. Kind of like how Ethan Hawke played him.

Hamlet's age is a debate among scholars, if I remember my dramaturgy class. There was the school of thought for late-teens, 20-ish and then there was an argument that he was older, maybe 30. (Remember Mel Gibson's Hamlet when he look older than his mother?) I can't remember the reasons why anymore.

I believe there is a reference somewhere in the text that implies Hamlet is 30. However, he has supposedly just come home from school, and it doesn't make sense to many scholars that Hamlet would be still studying at 30. I don't remember all of the specifics anymore.