I"ve read it twice, and both time were more stoppy-starty than usual for me. I like seeing how much Latin I can recall.
I tried to read Foucault's Pendulum many years ago, but gave it up. Course, this was in college, when my brilliant pre-reading strategy for any halfway philosopical text was to smoke some pot, read, and wait for flashes of enlightenment. Strangely enough, this strategy made me hungry rather than transcendent.
I"ve read it twice, and both time were more stoppy-starty than usual for me.
It's taken me longer than I anticipated. All the papal politics both bore and confuse me.
I have
Foucault's Pendulum
ready to start next, but I'm afraid. It seems like it might be a wee bit more exciting, though.
I found
Foucault's Pendulum
to be rougher going than
Name of the Rose,
although I liked it immensely. I'm a medieval fangirl, particularly the high weirdness that was the Church, so I was comfortable in the
Rose
world, but modern Italian politics and Italians were terra incognita to me. I can understand the accusations of plagarism (
Rose
) also, as
Pendulum
and Eco's other writings (and I've read a LOT of his stuff) seem to all come from the same author, but
Rose
seems like a very different author.
I read Eliot's
The Wasteland
at the same time I read
Foucault's Pendulum,
and pot would've helped with both.
One of my MA's is in Medieval Lit, so I like the papal bull. Hee.
I love Cryptonomicon -- I'm in the middle of rereading it right now -- but I haven't been able to get through Quicksilver.
Hey, did you know LMB is coming out with a new book in a new series this fall? [link] (Thank to erinaceous for the heads up.)
I'm afraid I've been incredibly eeeeh about all her non-SF books. Here's hoping this isn't another fantasy.
And Jacqueline Carey's newest book (about Imriel) hits bookstores 6/12!