I keep hoping someday someone will do a production of it where the majority of the story is treated like a horror movie. I think it could be very creepy, if approached properly.
Why am I imagining a prominent place for Mr. Gaiman in creating this?
'Destiny'
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
I keep hoping someday someone will do a production of it where the majority of the story is treated like a horror movie. I think it could be very creepy, if approached properly.
Why am I imagining a prominent place for Mr. Gaiman in creating this?
I keep hoping someday someone will do a production of it where the majority of the story is treated like a horror movie. I think it could be very creepy, if approached properly.
I've seen footage of a stage production that took this tack. I think it was done by someone in the UK during the 80s (but possibly the 70s).
Why am I imagining a prominent place for Mr. Gaiman in creating this?
Because Tim Burton didn't occur to you first?
I'm trying to imagine a goth version of Midsummer Night's Dream ....
I keep hoping someday someone will do a production of it where the majority of the story is treated like a horror movie. I think it could be very creepy, if approached properly.
Yes. The fairies are treated far too lightly in the productions I have seen. Midsummer Night's Dream is my favorite Shakespeare play.
Why am I imagining a prominent place for Mr. Gaiman in creating this?
Because he kind of already did it in Sandman?
Because he kind of already did it in Sandman?
Well, sure. But... live!
Because he kind of already did it in Sandman?
Yes, but I want it much creepier than that.
I have to be all contrarian and say that I've seen Branagh's Hamlet three times through and my admiration for it is nearly boundless (the final inexorable bound: I may possibly hate Robin Williams as Osric even more than Robin Williams in Patch Adams and Bicentennial Man combined). I don't care if it's longer than fuck; I love the language, every word of it, and whatever faults Branagh's performance and direction may have, they (to me, anyway) so vividly convey his love of that language and convey just how alive, how present that language is to him.
And, really, I can't let myself think about Kate Winslet's performance for too long or I will start to tear up right here at my desk. The only Ophelia I've ever seen who's even come close to her is Paul Gross (no, seriously--watch S1 of Slings & Arrows; you'll see).
And now I'm thinking about Mark Knopfler's "Romeo and Juliet," its weariness and yearning and nostalgia for that electric too-stupid-to-live time. I can't root for their doom; fuck, I was them. I never even had a boyfriend until I was 19, but I was them anyway. And I hope to God Matilda lives to be them, and lives beyond it, and lives to look back and say, "When we made love, you used to cry. You said I love you like the stars above, love you till I die" and know that it's gone, but remember exactly what it felt like, what it was to live in the eye of that storm. And R&J never get to outgrow it, smarten up, look back and regret and yearn.
I like it, although Claire Danes was a little too old for Juliet IMHO,
She's the only one who nailed "It is nor hand, nor foot, nor arm, nor face, nor any other part belonging to a man" that I've seen so far. She actually made me like Juliet, which is no small feat.