I loved Cryptonomicon, but wasn't really able to get into the Baroque Cycle. Very excited about this new book.
Literary Buffistas 3: Don't Parse the Blurb, Dear.
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
Hil is me.
I liked Cryptonomicon quite a lot, but Stephenson just took off during the Baroque Cycle.
In a good way? I still haven't attempted it. How does it compare to Cryptonomicon, which I loved? Stylistically/contentwise, I mean.
Why had I not heard of this? Awesome.
Er. Isn't that why we have libraries?
Until the local branch library re-opens and/or the NYPL system starts delivering to my door, this is more convenient.
Not that I'm going to do it. Too addicted to my Kindle. Real books are totally passé.
In a good way?
I think so, but you see a few people here who disagree. It took me a few hundred pages to get into the first volume, but once I was in, I read the trilogy steadily for a few weeks. I couldn't wait to get home from work to read some more.
How does it compare to Cryptonomicon, which I loved? Stylistically/contentwise, I mean.
I think the major themes are similar, but the technology is Enlightenment-era rather than late-90s cutting edge. It's all about the flow of information across the world, the thrill and horror of discovery, and the way that minor political battles in one place can greatly affect larger battles elsewhere. I really loved the way that he inhabited the period and brought a number of these Enlightenment philosopher/scientists types to life. Especially Leibniz. I enjoyed the political intrigue that swung across all of Western Europe, and I liked the Victorian-style boy's-own-adventure style of the seafaring stories. It was a massive undertaking, and I thought that Stephenson brought it all together swimmingly.
It's way more pulp than art, I should say. Stephenson's not the most insightful or poetic writer out there. But he's very creative and clever, and I never felt like he stumbled in the stories.
It's all about the flow of information across the world, the thrill and horror of discovery, and the way that minor political battles in one place can greatly affect larger battles elsewhere.
Oooh, awesome. What I loved about Cryptonomicon was seeing how information flow differed in the two eras.
It's way more pulp than art, I should say.
Not the A-word again!!
I retain my title of Grand Commissioner Of Using The Term "Art" Correctly Unlike The Rest Of You Proles, Unless You Happen To Be Using It Like I Do, In Which Case It's All Good And I Apologize For Calling You A Prole.
Stinkin' relativist.
I'm an absolutist about my authority and innate rightness! Otherwise, yes.
Oh, I just loves me some Corwood.