That is an Anne Tyler novel.
You take that back, you! t Anne Tyler partisan
Harmony ,'Conviction (1)'
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
That is an Anne Tyler novel.
You take that back, you! t Anne Tyler partisan
you forgot the long passages where he sits at the kitchen table looking regretfully into the distance while his coffee slowly gets cold
Pfft. The protagonist of my worthwhile adult fiction would never sit around indulging in a wet and impractical emotion like regret. He may occasionally think back on the old days and say to himself, "My, that was a time, wasn't it?" as he takes his coffee cup out of the microwave, but he doesn't let it go beyond that. He's not living in a piece of trashy fiction, after all.
Toss out epic sweep of plot, you eliminate fiction by everyone from Homer to Dickens to Larry McMurtry. Not to mention that tossing one person's meaningful impact also shitcans the biographies of a hell of a lot of actual human beings who were apparently not so much heroic as misguided by adolescent fantasy.
Yeah, I'm insanely confused as to how "epic sweep of plot" and "one person having a meaningful impact on history" are cornered by the YA market. I mean, the former alone is completely and utterly baffling.
I did mention that Peter Jackson had the film rights to Novik's books, which seemed to impress her.
I really don't know what she reads, except that she likes mysteries but seems to feel the need to apologize for doing so. Obviously it's her issue rather than mine, but it's a bit baffling to figure out how to respond. I mean, she also doesn't get why I'm interested in the Napoleonic era--because she thinks the Victorian era is more interesting. When she asked (months ago, just after we met), I gave my usual explanation: that in some ways I stumbled across the era almost by accident, but that it held my interest because it's modern enough to seem familiar and recognizable, but it's also the last era before technology really sped up our lives, in that you couldn't move faster than a galloping horse on land and at sea were at the mercy of the winds. And, you know, the clothes were cool.
Cue baffled look. For a woman in her 50's, she seems to have some trouble with the fact that other people don't necessarily think like she does.
I had thought a girl I knew in college was the least tactful person alive, but Susan's co-worker has proved that wrong.
As for alternate history being the stuff of YA, even Newt Gingrich (insert gesture warding off the evil eye) has written alternate history, as well as some actual writers including H.G. Wells, Winston Churchill, Allen Drury, Vladimir Nabokov and Philip K Dick.
Also, you're both wrong. The most interesting era is America in the late 19th century.
I like Anne Tyler, too. Although I must admit she's not the poster girl for "Wow, then what happened?" storytelling. But I don't want that all the time.(Weird thing for a crime junkie to say, maybe, but it's still true.)
Reading for pleasure, as opposed to reading for enlightenment, is considered juvenile. I think adults are only supposed to read things that have insightful things about the angst of modern existence. Anything else is trite escapism.
Excuse me while I go back to my SGA fan fic.
Reading for pleasure, as opposed to reading for enlightenment, is considered juvenile.
Why can't you do both at the same time?
I'll take europe between the wars
and the lead up to the civil war as the most interesting time periods in history.
It boggles my mind that people make a lot of judgments about what other people read. Admittedly , Matt has opinions about what I read - but he understands that 1) it isn't going to stop me 2) ill informed opinions will be beaten by a large club and 3) and volunteering an opinion when I am trying to read is a sure fire way to annoy me. Plus he also knows that after himself, I am his best source for new reading material
I do not like most serious modern novels. I wish something to happen in a novel. Things happened in works of literature all the way up to around the 1950s, when suddenly writing had to be all twee and introspective to be respected. There was once a New Yorker cartoon that poked fun at the very type of fiction the New Yorker often runs. It showed a guy in the kitchen making a sandwich and said something like "He smoothed the peanut butter over the crisp toasted bread, the same whole wheat bread his mother had bought all those years ago. He watched as his knife formed hills and valleys in the brown paste and dreamily slid the knife over his creation again and again. There should be jelly, made from wild beach plums....."