books you could life with one hand.

er...should have been "books you could lift" up there, obviously.

I'm the only person I know of with ovaries who doesn't love The Diamond Age. I was so bored reading it it took me three tries to get through the whole thing. I'm a Snow Crash girl all the way.

And I haven't reread any Gibson in far too long. Must fix that.

I'm the only person I know of with ovaries who doesn't love The Diamond Age.

raises hand

I found ANOTHER box of books I need to get rid of. And of course while all the "get rid of" books were out on tables and such, the DH went through and pulled back several he'd previously let go of. We just can't tolerate being parted from books.

At this point, what I want is a cave, where I can pile all the books up and lair on them, and savage anyone who tries to take them.

I was "meh" on The Diamond Age but am an unabashed Gibson fangurl. Neuromancer left deep impressions on me. I prefer his short stories but I like where he's been going with his more recent novels.

raises hand too

I love Gibson and always have. But Stephenson is Da Man, in my opinion.

Though I, too, was "meh" on The Diamond Age.

The rest of his stuff, though... Snow Crash and especially Cryptonomicon ...loved. LOVED. Read Quicksilver , but have yet to read the rest of the Baroque Cycle.

What I love about Stephenson is that he sort of assumes you know of the tech and then will tell you how it works. Gibson, I seem to recall, admitted he knew jack about computers when he wrote Neuromancer but, as was mentioned previously, was far more interested in technology's effect on society and people.

Stephenson's characters have more depth in my opinion, while Gibson's weirder explorations are more compelling in a different way.

I like Sterling a lot as an editor, but I don't enjoy his writing.

I think that's Sterling I'm thinking of.

Neuromancer was a revelation to me, but it started to seem like Gibson was continuing to write in that universe because that's what people expected. Pattern Recognition was thoroughly awesome abd made me love him again.

Snow Crash seemed like something really new and different when it came out, but The Baroque Cycle has overshadowed all other Stephenson for me.

Gibson, I seem to recall, admitted he knew jack about computers when he wrote Neuromancer but, as was mentioned previously, was far more interested in technology's effect on society and people.

Yeah -- he had a blog entry a while back (while he was writing Spook County IIRC) about how people often write him asking exactly what some bit of tech in his novels is supposed to look like, and how a fair amount of the time, he really has no idea. Just because his characters are in many cases partially defined by their implants doesn't mean he has any clue what they look like or how they're supposed to "work."

I like that about Gibson. Sometimes it's the time for OCD projections of current tech. And sometimes it's so concept-based you not only can't call foul, but just have to sit back and enjoy the conceptual ride.

Stephenson's characters have more depth in my opinion, while Gibson's weirder explorations are more compelling in a different way.

Man, I couldn't agree more. I loved Neuromancer way back when, but so much of the guy's subsequent writing has the same formula: one or two brilliant ideas, a couple of sharp turns of phrase, but leaden characters, poorly written action sequences (it's all but impossible to tell what's going on in many of them), and a rehash of the same old plot. I read most every Gibson book, but mostly for the cool ideas.

Neuromancer was a revelation to me, but it started to seem like Gibson was continuing to write in that universe because that's what people expected. Pattern Recognition was thoroughly awesome abd made me love him again.

-t is me. I read Neuromancer when it first came out, and it was one of the few times I realized that I had seen the birth of something new. I was about to give up on Gibson after several books of well-written pointlessness and then Pattern Recognition came along.