I'd be up for reopening that thread for a while, if people wanted to.
That's quite a good idea, IMHO.
We already have a thread, which was already used for HP6. Discussions there could be without any sort of whitefont, while here people could still talk about other books without the need to wade through dozens upon dozens of whitefonted (or black-and-white artistic forms) posts.
A LJ PSA from a couple places on my FL:
PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT
IF "HARRYPOOTER" FRIENDS YOU, DO NOT GO AND LOOK AT THEIR JOURNAL. IT IS A ^*&^*%@ GIANT SPOILER FOR HARRY POTTER.
I haven't looked, and I don't know if whatever spoiler is there is true or not. But I thought I should warn people.
Well now I wanna go look!!!!
Aimee, it occurred to me - you don't need to find a rich older man - Daniel Radcliffe is a rich YOUNG man (according to the cover of People I saw at the doctor's).
Eeep. I just took "harry potter" out of my LJ interests to keep from being a target.
Aimee, it occurred to me - you don't need to find a rich older man - Daniel Radcliffe is a rich YOUNG man (according to the cover of People I saw at the doctor's).
I KNOW! $50 million for the last two films!!
IF "HARRYPOOTER" FRIENDS YOU
I love teh crazy when it is not my crazy.
Nobody reads "I Claudius"?
So I should stop reading it every few months even though I enjoy it so much, along with "Claudius the God"?
I think that was TypoBoy's point, connie, that Graves is a bad example of an author that nobody reads. Because people do.