> How explicit is it,
Not at all, in my opinion. Far less explicit that most romance novels, probably.
and if anyone has the illustrated edition, do the pictures get at all graphic?
There's a picture of the two of them kissing, and then there is a picture (at a distance) of them in the woods at night. She's
sitting on top of him, but all you see is his face, and her naked back legs.
I wouldn't think it would cause even a prudish person to raise their eyebrows and/or blush.
Weird coincidence -- one of the original Nancy Drew movies from it looks like the '40s is just starting on TCM.
No coincidence - TCM always does that with new movies coming out. I'm sure they knew a new Nancy Drew had opened.
I think she was pointing out that it coincided with our talking about Nancy Drew books, not with the movie coming out. Unless you're claiming TCM is planning all our conversations... are they listening right now?
Oh, so we could think of an old movie we'd like to see again and start discussing the book it was from here and then it would pop up on TCM. We would be doing their scheduling.
I think she was pointing out that it coincided with our talking about Nancy Drew books, not with the movie coming out.
Yes, this.
Although sumi's suggestion is awesome.
Just don't start talking about that one with the giant ants ::shudder::
Slate writes the ending to HP.
Points upthread and to cable drama.
Colbert spoiled the ending already anyway:
Hermione's a duuude.