I know I have read most if not all of Agatha Christie but what I actually remember of the books is probably not very much. I mean, Murder on the Orient Express and And Then There Were None I remember who did it and I can recall bits and pieces of many others but I'm certain there is a lot I have forgotten. But I also know that I didn't actually like all of them and there is a LOT - I made a spreadsheet of the books I've read and am thinking of reading next for this little project and the Hercule Poirot and Miss Marple alone come to 60 titles! Of course, what I've already read comes to 83 titles so maybe I shouldn't let that number scare me.

Huh, only 15 Miss Marple. That seems quite manageable.

I'm not sure how I managed to just bypass Victorian literature so thoroughly. The only Dickens I read in school was A Christmas Carol, which I loved, and I read Great Expectations a few years ago because someone told me I should, I think? Or maybe I found a copy in a used book store and thought it was a good idea? Don't remember. It didn't make me want to run out and read a bunch more, though, is what I got out of that.

I think I tried reading Robert E. Howard and E.E. Smith because I have a friend who really likes them but they were not really for me. My science fiction tastes were mostly formed by reading the "Best of [Year]" collections of short stories that my dad left lying around, probably. And whatever was on the SF shelf in the YA section of the library, which I read all of because there was just the one shelf. Mysteries I mostly read my mom's books, and some from the library but I had to have an author to look for for those.

Poirot is fine, but Miss Marple is awesome. Tommy and Tuppence I can take or leave, except for...By the Pricking of My Thumbs. And maybe N or M?.

I may have only read a couple of Tommy and Tuppence but I didn't care for them at all. I didn't realize until I was putting together my list that some of the books I am quite sure I have read featured Sergeant Battle who I have no memory of whatsoever - in my head those books are Poirot. And I know I've read some Parker Pym but that is all I remember about that, that he exists.

I think I am pretty well set on reading all of Miss Marple; having the canon all in order and as much in my head together as I can manage seems like it would be interesting and fun. I'll decide about Poirot later.

And then there's adaptations, I don't know what I'm going to do about adaptations. I've been able to keep up with them easily so far because there haven't been very many but it only just now as I am typing this struck me that I didn't even try to get into Holmes adaptations. in my defense, I started with Holmes and didn't think of this as A Project until after I was well into Marsh.

I gave the first Tommy and Tuppence book, The Secret Adversary to my tween cousin a couple of Christmases ago, and it made its way across the whole family over time. I still like it!

I am also here to recommend Bleak House! It's a good one to take breaks from, since it's so long and was originally written as a serial anyway. But it's great!

Bleak House is definitely to be read soon! Sounds like it might be a good one to read bits of while I’m waiting for reports to run during work day, that’s always a plus. And I believe there’s an adaptation with Gillian Anderson so I’m already looking forward to that.

Adding The Secret Adversary to the list

Bleak House is definitely to be read soon!

FWIW, Lynda Barry is currently reading Bleak House and almost to the end.

I have read The Woman in White and The Moonstone and they are both pretty good!

I've been meaning to read those for ages. I need to get on that.

I know I have read most if not all of Agatha Christie but what I actually remember of the books is probably not very much. I mean, Murder on the Orient Express and And Then There Were None I remember who did it and I can recall bits and pieces of many others but I'm certain there is a lot I have forgotten. But I also know that I didn't actually like all of them and there is a LOT - I made a spreadsheet of the books I've read and am thinking of reading next for this little project and the Hercule Poirot and Miss Marple alone come to 60 titles! Of course, what I've already read comes to 83 titles so maybe I shouldn't let that number scare me.

I am blessed with the fact that I read them all as a teen but remember almost nothing, so when I reread it's pretty much all a surprise, except the two above and Roger Ackroyd. About five years ago, I planned to reread my collection: [link]

As a result, I prepared a whole spreadsheet with all 80+ books (U.S. & U.K. editions), pub dates, featured detectives, etc. If you are interested, shoot me an an email and I can send it.

My initial idea was to block each decade, like so: [link]

But I keep starting and stopping after that first batch and haven't quite finished the 30s. I need to get back to it but I don't like to read more than a few at a time.

Ooh, megan, that sounds like more detail than I need but of course I will want to see your spreadsheet! I’ll be in touch tomorrow. I also remember who killed Roger Ackroyd but not much else about that story.

When I started with Marsh I intended to read one decade’s worth of books per month. That didn’t last very long but I ended up binging them faster than that - got all interested in the historical details and what changed over time and what didn’t. I do have to take breaks in between my binges, though. Fortunately there are plenty of completely different-from-these books that I want to read and more keep coming out...