I read some classic SF/fantasy in high school after discovering Tolkien, but the only ones I purchased were A Canticle for Liebowitz and Time After Time. Both of those were lost in the great basement flood of 1991. That was about it, although I do have a lot of time-travel, fantasy, and SF romance.

Right now, I'm cataloging the stuff the order in which it's coming out of the boxes. Expect in influx of Pratchett, manga, and cookbooks in the near future.

It's interesting to me to ponder whether I will log only what I own, or add things I read but don't own. The composition of the library would differ.

In any case, I happen to neither read nor own much sf/f - Tolkein and Connie Willis are about it for me. Expect a mix of nonfiction (everything from math to classics), romance, mystery, and children's books from me.

I've got a bunch of sci fi things that aren't up there yet. Mostly because they're on the shelves (or stacks) in the other room.

I'm annoyed that the "most commonly shared" stuff doesn't seem to be updating - or maybe that's just on my computer?

Most of my SF is still in boxes.

I have a feeling I'll be shelling out for the lifetime membership once I get them unpacked.

Has anyone here read any Charles Chesnutt? I'm reading him for my short story class right now, and he is incredible. Such a breath of fresh air after Poe! And, actually, Melville as well.

He writes in dialect a lot, so a lot of my classmates are having "trouble" reading him. So, they complain a lot. I'd love to discuss him if anyone else has read any of his stuff. For Monday we read a bunch of the Uncle Julius stories, and today we're reading "The Dumb Witness" and "Dave's Neckliss."

I have, but it's been a while. I do have his collected short stories on the shelf right behind me.

Did you have trouble with the dialect? I had to read those parts a little slower, but didn't have "trouble." I couldn't believe all the complaining on Monday. I was like, "People. Get a grip. Learn to learn!"

I may have issues.

I don't recall having trouble, except that it took a couple of pages to get into the rhythm of it.

I've read one Chesnutt story, but I will say that it's a major feature of fiction in that period using dialect -- it's supposed to be "authentic." (There's a whole dissertation in there, about authentic national literatures and independence movements in Ireland, Finland, the rise of Beowulf being taught in England, etc. and how the US, not having an historical national document to fall back on, created documents of the now, i.e. contemporary folk tales.)

I find stabs at dialect difficult to read because they're often spelled counterintuitively -- e.g., Mark Twain using oncet for the Missouri tendency to add a T sound to the end of "once". When I read Twain for the first time, I thought he was trying to say onset, and I think if he'd spelled it phonetically, i.e. wunst, I would not have been nearly as confused.

The thing that bugs me most about historical representations of dialect is the apostrophes, though. It's like every printer in the land discovered he could make an extra half-cent for every unnecessary character he could add to the line of print, and went hog-wild on the apostrophes.