the idea of someone just out of elementary school reading "24 Hours" is making me clutch my hypothetical pearls in horror.
I was going to say
Pfffft, Sandman is totally appropriate for an 11 year old!,
and then I stopped and asked myself if I'd be willing to give it to Princess Tickybox in three years. Ha, nope.
"24 Hours", I'm guessing?
Yep.
My gut reaction was definitely um, no, not for an 11-year-old.
Thanks, everyone. It's been a while since I read them. I probably would let an 11 year old of mine read them, but TCG's brother and sister-in-law probably wouldn't. I ended up picking up a book on drawing superheroes for my nephew instead.
I have to agree about the appropriateness. Just because the stories are lovely and superbly written doesn't mean they're for all ages. Of Gaiman's catalog, I guess Coraline, The Graveyard Book and Mirrormask would be good for tweens?
Coraline
and
The Graveyard Book
for sure. Also the picture book about trading dad for a goldfish because it's funny.
Stardust,
maybe? It's been ages since I even skimmed through it, but I don't remember anything glaringly inappropriate.
He really prefers graphic novels to books, but I don't know what he has read, so I bought him the book on drawing superheroes instead, because I heard he recently started becoming interesting in drawing.
Stardust is sort of a hybrid of text and image, at least in the One True Edition (IMO), but it does include a sex scene in the beginning.
Thanks, JZ. Glad you like them. Your check's incoming.
I started reading a lot of stuff ahead of my age, so I would be terrible at assessing what to give a kid to read.
I feel like there's a significant different between eleven-year-olds who picking up Sandman on their own, and giving a copy to them. But I don't really have an opinion as to appropriateness.