Yeah, the blog entries and the little post-scripts at the end of each chapter, some with more oomph than others.
'Underneath'
Literary Buffistas 3: Don't Parse the Blurb, Dear.
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
Someone else said they found it in the YA section, but it's sci-fi/horror. The characters are also older than the typical YA protagonists.
There is another Feed that IS YA, so that's why you may have been confused.
Yeah, the blog entries and the little post-scripts at the end of each chapter, some with more oomph than others.
Yep. Yep.
well I'll be damned. you know, I am not sure I knew how old the protags were. they seemed young to me, but you are right, they aren't 14 or anything.
I haz Skulduggery Pleasant! There goes my weekend.
they seemed young to me, but you are right, they aren't 14 or anything.
I think they're all mid- to late-twenties.
Ok, so now I need the Time to Read feature to extrapolate and turn the pages for me, at the rate I've been going in my current book. So it can let me blaze through easy read stuff and then give me more time for Jacques Ellul or whatever.
We can do this, peoples, we have the technology!
I could have used the Time To Read feature last night - I got into bed last night to read without realizing I was three pages from the end of the book. (Granted, I could have looked at the percentage last night and noticed I was 98% done, BUT STILL.)
98% is misleading, though! You don't know if the book actually goes to 100% or not. Like the Sherlock Holmes books I have are from Project Gutenberg, so at the end is all the copyright information and whatnot, so the books actually end in the 90% range.
It's like how I have to check each ASOIAF book to figure out when all the damn appendices start so I can gauge when I'll hit the end of the actual book.
The thing is, Roth is mad that the Wikipedia article states that his character is alleged to have been inspired by Broyard. But that is a fact; several prominent reviews of the books suggested the inspiration might have been Broyard, including Kakutani in the Times; there are links in the current version of the Wikipedia article. Philip Roth can (and, obviously does) argue that the character was not inspired by Broyard. But Wikipedia is (and was) not wrong when it states that it was alleged that the character was inspired by Broyard.
So, Philip Roth is an ass, but then, I thought that anyway.