That's trippy, Raq.
Buffy ,'Showtime'
Literary Buffistas 3: Don't Parse the Blurb, Dear.
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
Shrift, it's probably too late, but I'd recommend The Privilege of the Sword by Ellen Kushner, which has fannish behavior, girls in tall boots and feather hats learning to fence, and a tormented gay male romance. Plus, sex. I enjoyed it lots, more than The Fall of Kings, which did little for me.
I did already go shopping, Consuela, but I'll never turn down a book rec. I'm getting a lot of reading done on the bus these days.
I liked The Fall of the Kings, but more in a "so that's what they were talking about way than a "that's wicked cool" way. Kinda like the Silmarillion, actually. The Privilege of the Sword, on the other hand, rocked hardcore. I can't wait till my daughter's old enough to read it.
The last book I read and loved was The Chinatown Death Cloud Peril
I was kind of eh on The Chinatown Death Cloud Peril but I can't not recommend it. I also have a hardcover copy of it free to a good home, if anyone wants it.
It took me some time to get into it. I'm very rusty on my Cthulu mythos but after the plot got rolling I was hooked the rest of the way through.
Did anyone here read The Devil in the White City ? (I know there was a time when every other person in Chicago was reading it, but I don't know whether that applies elsewhere.)
I read about half of it. I'm not into True Crime stories at all, and I was honestly hoping for more on the White City and less on the Devil.
That was more or less my issue. The serial killer bit - eh, whatever. Kind of remarkable that that particular case didn't seem to make it into the public consciousness like his contemporaries Jack the Ripper and Lizzie Borden, even in Chicago, but other than that? Boring.
The architecture and the city planning and the politics were unexpectedly fascinating. I wanted more as well, plus I read it over Thanksgiving, and I was really frustrated not having wikipedia at the ready. And as Chicago history goes in particular, it's amazing. Most of the reviews I've seen seemed to be coming from the opposite perspective though, which was puzzling.
I didn't feel that he really tied the two elements together in any but the most superficial ways. Disappointing.