I like it, but there's what I presume is a spoiler on the back cover that I wish I hadn't seen. I'm a little over halfway into it.
'War Stories'
Literary Buffistas 3: Don't Parse the Blurb, Dear.
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
Frickin' back covers! I try to avoid reading them if I know I'm going to read the book.
I'm still annoyed that the jacket blurb for The Lovely Bones spoiled THE CLIMAX OF THE BOOK.
G.K. Chesterton wrote a poem about how everything is on the back of the cover.
House of Stairs was great. It definitely had a big impact on me as a kid, especially in the area of "the authorities may not have your best interests at heart".
Has anyone toyed with The Mongoliad? They're up to 30-some chapters (if I read the TOC right) - that's a lot of catching up.
Has anyone toyed with The Mongoliad?
I remember hearing about it before it started, but nothing since. Is it any good?
Consuela, I braked at the TOC. I'm still considering the commitment.
"You Can Stuff Your Mary-Sue Where The Sun Don't Shine" Hah.
"You Can Stuff Your Mary-Sue Where The Sun Don't Shine" Hah.
That reminded me that I'm behind on the Demon's Lexicon series. I think I only read the first one, actually.
I feel bad for the Department of Mysteries. The DA totally destroyed, like, hundreds of prophecies! What if they were important?!
I was thinking recently about how Harriet Vane is a total authorial self-insert, and yet is also totally awesome and not a Mary Sue.
My going theory is that Dorothy Sayers herself is so awesome that inserting herself into the story just carried the awesome along with her. Well, and also Harriet is flawed and fairly realistic, but I like the awesomeness theory better.