Yeah, I don't think that most of the movies, except the first one, make much sense without the books. And once you get past the third or so, there's so much backstory that it would take about three movies per book to get in all the explanations. I thought OotP especially seemed like a bunch of scenes strung together, like they knew they had to get in certain things that would be important later, but there were so many of those that there wasn't really time to really get a plot.
Giles! I accidentally killed Spike. That's okay, right?
Buffy ,'Never Leave Me'
Literary Buffistas 3: Don't Parse the Blurb, Dear.
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
Hil R. - Jun 04, 2011 4:36:22 pm PDT #15098 of 28282
Sometimes I think I might just move up to Vermont, open a bookstore or a vegan restaurant. Adam Schlesinger, z''l
Dana - Jun 04, 2011 4:36:45 pm PDT #15099 of 28282
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
It's not that his father's patronus was a stag, it's because he was an Animagus that turned into a stag.
So...yeah. Not a sentence I thought I'd type.
erin_obscure - Jun 04, 2011 4:42:01 pm PDT #15100 of 28282
Occasionally I’m callous and strange
Wow, I'd totally forgotten that tidbit.
Dana - Jun 04, 2011 4:51:52 pm PDT #15101 of 28282
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
I spent a lot of time reading Marauders-era fic.
Aims - Jun 04, 2011 4:53:45 pm PDT #15102 of 28282
Shit's all sorts of different now.
If I had millions of dollars, I'd pay for those girls to finish The Shoebox Project.
Polgara - Jun 04, 2011 4:54:03 pm PDT #15103 of 28282
Karma is a cat, sleeping in my lap cuz it loves me. ~TS
Which in turn is why Snape's patronus is so important.
Aims - Jun 04, 2011 4:55:34 pm PDT #15104 of 28282
Shit's all sorts of different now.
Reason # 45923 why I wish they had waited until canon was completed before making the movies.
Amy - Jun 04, 2011 4:59:41 pm PDT #15105 of 28282
Because books.
I got through four paragraphs of this Wall Street Journal article on YA books and am so enraged I'm not going to finish it right now. I did glance at the sidebar of books they *can* recommend for young readers, and noticed how helpfully they split the list into books for boys and girls.
Did we go back to 1950 today and I missed it?
Gris - Jun 04, 2011 5:28:12 pm PDT #15106 of 28282
Hey. New board.
The article's pretty annoying, but I don't generally think that breaking YA books into separate lists for boys and girls is necessarily bad, though I certainly think there should be a third (larger) list for the crossovers. It's the rare boy who likes "The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants" (though we are a generally cool bunch).
erin_obscure - Jun 04, 2011 5:37:29 pm PDT #15107 of 28282
Occasionally I’m callous and strange
I thought the big deal with Snape's patronus was that it's the same as Lily's...i.e that he loved Harry's mom SO MUCH that his patronus matched hers. Did i even read the same books as everyone else??