I got 3 out of 10. I think I reverse-reverse psychologied myself out of a few correct answers, where something read as so thoroughly male that I figured the test-makers were trying to make us second-guess ourselves and think we were outsmarting them by choosing "female," only to have it turn out it actually was written by a male-type person. And then it turned out it actually was written by a woman.

Or something. Anyhow, I talked myself out of at least three correct answers based not on the texts but on what I thought the test-writers thought I would think of the texts.

I did that on the last question, JZ.

I also failed. And assumed VS Naipaul's paragraph was written by a woman.

I guessed blindly, didn't even try to think them through, as I recognized none of them. And because I have so frequently had my writing taken for male that I figured there was no point in trying to guess.

I got 50% and it told me that I need to read more books by men.

I got 50% and it told me that I need to read more books by men.

I got 60% and it said the same thing. I think this is just one big scam to get us to read more books by men.

I got 7 out of 10 and it did not tell me I need to read more books by men.

VS Naipaul, Nicholas Sparks and Salman Rushdie write like women. Neener, neener. Also, their mothers dress them funny.

I looked Naipaul up in Wiki and he seems like a real charmer, too.

I got 4 out of 10. But 2 of the 4 I had read already, so I knew the author.