"Goth" is code for "emotionally troubled," and Fanboy is mostly a whiner.
Gnnnng. Okay then, I'll give it a miss.
'The Killer In Me'
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
"Goth" is code for "emotionally troubled," and Fanboy is mostly a whiner.
Gnnnng. Okay then, I'll give it a miss.
Stoner & Spaz was much better than I expected it to be. well done.
And as for contemporary books about how high school/the teen years suck ASS, well, I would say that BTVS ruined me for any further fiction about high school sucking. I set the bar pretty high.
I'm enjoying King Dork pretty well so far. But I'm only 100 or so pages in.
King Dork
I enjoyed it. Not my favorite of all time but very enjoyable.
I have an odd couple of questions: has anyone read the Cirque du Freak YA series? It looks like the sort of YA vampire novel thing I enjoy, and I picked up the first book at Half Price Books … only to discover that each chapter header has a large illustration of a tarantula. And the bit of the introduction I skimmed was all about how the main character luuuurves spiders, and his happiest birthday was when his parents gave him a pet tarantula.
So, my big question is how spider-riffic is this book and/or series? I am mostly okay with short written things about spiders, but lots of description about how they move, or look, or lots of scenes with them will make me very uncomfortable. (I mean, I adore Caitlin R. Kiernan’s writing, but I don’t have any plans to re-read Silk or A Murder of Angels anytime soon, thanks to all the spider scenes.)
Anyone?
Jilli, Jake has read all of them and adores them. He's not home until dinner, but I'll ask him how spider-riffic the books are.
Oh, thank you AmyLiz! That would be a big help.
Jilli, according to Jake the spider figures kind of prominently in the first few books because the boy can communicate with it. He said the author makes the spider seem "kind of superior" but there's no "icky" stuff. (Remember, this is fifteen-year-old-speak.) He does say the spider is given a personality, but I don't know if that makes it better or worse. He does describe the spider from time to time, as well, and for whatever reason his descriptions made Jake picture it really big.
Hope that helps. I could page through the first book tonight if you want, since I seem to be up for doing anything that is not writing the book that's due very, very soon.
I could page through the first book tonight if you want, since I seem to be up for doing anything that is not writing the book that's due very, very soon.
Hee! Who am I to tell you not to procrastinate?
I suspect, from Jake's description, that I should just give this series a miss. Talking to the spider? Giving it a personality? I think that would probably involve holding the spider and whatnot, and just typing that made me break out in goosebumps.
Yeah, I'm willing to bet he holds it, too.
If he can dig it out of the pit of despair his bedroom, I'll look through it tonight. I've been half meaning to read the books anyway.