I prefer novels. I enjoy short stories too, but because I remember them more easily,they don't have the same reread-value as a novel.

I generally avoid series, at least those which might be described as "epic." I mean, I still like most of McDonald's Fletch/Flynn books, and more serialized things like that. The books I'm reading right are technically in a shared universe (or multiverse) but there's no prescribed order or anything.

I've never had a preference about story length. Just story quality and the appropriateness of the length to the story at hand. Some take a while, some should be brief.

Joe Hill's Twentieth Century Ghosts was the last collection (by one author) that I read, and it was fantastic. Some longer, some shorter, just wonderful.

I tend to read more long novels or series than anything else, but I've never really thought of it as a preference.

It's also not like the bookstores abound in short story collections anymore, and unless you're seeking out lit mags or reading online, short stories are generally in short supply anymore.

I have another collection by Kelly Link I keep meaning to start, but I haven't started it yet. What I love about the form, though, is that I could sample one, put it down, and come back to it later.

Joe Hill's Twentieth Century Ghosts was the last collection (by one author) that I read, and it was fantastic. Some longer, some shorter, just wonderful.

Oh cool. I will add this to Crack List since I love his papa so much.

It's also not like the bookstores abound in short story collections anymore, and unless you're seeking out lit mags or reading online, short stories are generally in short supply anymore.

Every year I get the latest "Best Short Stories of [year]" for Christmas. I love them because I only get The New Yorker, so miss out on all of the contemporary short stories out there. These books are great for exposing me to awesome works.

In general, I read series, but that's because I like mysteries, and predictability. The last time I was at the library, I picked up a book by someone I don't remember reading much of, and I couldn't figure out why not, until I started this book, and had to stop after like 10 pages, because the set-up was so unbelievable.

I like novels. When well developed and maintained I like series. My reading tends to be character-driven, and if I like a character enough to follow him or her to the end of a novel, I'll generally be curious to see what s/he does next.

Give me a nice, big novel to get lost in. One of the things I like about Victorian novels is the way they can just kind of meander in a way that still keeps your attention.

Series can work if there's something to keep me interested. Mysteries seem to do it better, perhaps because so many are built around an interesting character, and a decent mystery (especially who-dun-its, which is my favorite type of mystery) almost has to be well plotted.

Flash can be fun once, but it's often tied to a gimmick. So it's less likely to hold up on re-reading unless you wait a long, long time between readings. (Come to think of it, the same is true of who-dun-its.)

I'm finding that even when writing short stories (all two of them), I want to make them into novels.