The only mysteries I've read are the ones I picked up at my grandmother's house after running out of other books (since she uses the spare bedroom mainly to store books when she's done reading them). I doubt I could tell you any of their names.
Literary Buffistas 3: Don't Parse the Blurb, Dear.
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
Does Oedipus Rex count? I would think so.
No Christie?! No Conan Doyle?! No P.D. James, for goodness sake?!
Not even Nancy Drew.
That baffles me, Raq. I mean, a PhD in ENGLISH! Wow.
I love mysteries.
Huh, Nancy Drew might have been the first mysteries I read. And Hardy Boys. And Trixie Belden.
I skipped Trixie Belden because my mom had her Cherry Ames books.
I imagine there are mystery families and not-mystery families, in addition to people.
That baffles me, Raq. I mean, a PhD in ENGLISH! Wow.
Mysteries aren't really on the curriculum. I mean, I had a B.A. in English and never read a mystery until I was well out of college. (Well, excepting Alfred Hitchcock and the Three Investigators and some other juveniles.) I read other things for light reading. Some people don't do light reading at all. I've never read anything by Agatha Christie.
I didn't really read mysteries until I started studying Film Noir then I went back to Woolrich, Chandler, Thompson, Hammett and Willeford.
I didn't mean they'd be on the curriculum. I meant that most people who do a PhD in English simply read a lot, and it surprises me she'd never read any mysteries at all.
I don't think all mysteries are light reading, either, though. I wouldn't say that of Elizabeth George's or most of Minette Walters, for sure.
I wouldn't say that of Elizabeth George's or most of Minette Walters, for sure.
NSM on the curriculum either. I mean, I certainly knew both academics and literary types who read and enjoyed mysteries - both cozy and hardboiled. It was actually much more acceptable than science fiction, and fantasy was beyond the pale. Shit, you should've seen the sneer I got from the department head when I mentioned (the rather erudite - that is, makes regular jokes based on lost Latin texts) James Branch Cabell (a fantasy writer - friend of Faulkner's too).
But it's not hard at all to me to imagine somebody getting a Ph.D. in literature without having ever read a mystery. That's not what they read (generally) or why they read.
They don't value popular literature -- in English departments anyway. There are other cultural studies approaches (like, deconstruction) which are no doubt poking around in Harry Potter, as previous academics dug into Buffy or Madonna or Pee Wee's Playhouse. But that's not the English Department.