I read it on my own, and I think I liked it. But I don't remember many details about it.

My copy of Bone Crossed by Patricia Briggs just arrived! I had been waiting for it to come out in paperback. It's perfect timing because TCG is working late, and I have no plans for the evening.

I can't imagine what it would be like to read in the fifties, since everyone's a wiseass now and the shocking part to me reading in 1990 or whatever is that I didn't see anything in it to make it the de facto book for serial killing psychos. Now, I understand that it was feeding an impulse in those already Not Right but the first time I read it, I expected it to be violent since Mark Chapman loved it so much...I wonder if Salinger ever knew that and if it ever made him sad. Because Holden is obviously smarting off when he says he's "hunting people".

I liked Catcher and would like to read it again. I LOVED Franny and Zooey and several of the Nine Stories.

My guess is I'd like Catcher more at this age (when I'm no longer expected to identify with Holden) than I did at 14-ish, when he mainly reminded me why I preferred books to people.

Bunch Of Phonies Mourn J.D. Salinger

CORNISH, NH—In this big dramatic production that didn't do anyone any good (and was pretty embarrassing, really, if you think about it), thousands upon thousands of phonies across the country mourned the death of author J.D. Salinger, who was 91 years old for crying out loud. "He had a real impact on the literary world and on millions of readers," said hot-shot English professor David Clarke, who is just like the rest of them, and even works at one of those crumby schools that rich people send their kids to so they don't have to look at them for four years. "There will never be another voice like his." Which is exactly the lousy kind of goddamn thing that people say, because really it could mean lots of things, or nothing at all even, and it's just a perfect example of why you should never tell anybody anything.

I never liked anything Salinger wrote. *shrug*. It might be worth re-reading as an adult (i initially read as a teen, on my own, never had classroom discussion or such) but i kinda doubt i'll ever get around to it. Especially when there are so many other books to read that DO appeal to me.

I had a major breakthrough a couple years ago that i don't HAVE to finish every book i start. I checked out Camus' _the Plague_ from the library because i vaguelly recalled _The Stranger_ being interesting and i find pretty much everything about the black plague to be fascinating. I didn't even get halfway through the book before i realised that i did not want to finish it, and would not improve my life in any significant way by slugging through the rest of the slight tome. It was the first time i ever even considered NOT finishing a book. Very liberating. In much the same bent, even though i have started the second part of the vampire diaries, i shall not finish it when the new books come out. Just not. And i rather enjoyed the first four books with the sort of guilty pleasure that had me seek out the twilight series.

Two Lumps take on The Catcher in the Rye: [link]

Catcher did nothing for me. But I read it late. I have a feeling you have to be in a certain pretty narrow window to really connect with it.

I think you can insert "Anything written by Ayn Rand" for Catcher here.

I enjoyed Catcher when I read it in high school, in spite of Holden as being the Whiniest Person. Lots of my students love it.

Steph, HA! Too funny.

oddly, I have read most of Sallinger many times, and i never remember anything about the books. Nothing .