Heee! I've read Princess of Cleves for some of my grad work. I actually enjoyed it.
I love the Divine Comedy (Paradiso the least, Puragatorio by far the most) but without patience and many many many footnotes, it is more interesting in concept than in reality.
Paradise Lost is on my list to read, but it also scares me a bit.
I love the Divine Comedy (Paradiso the least, Puragatorio by far the most) but without patience and many many many footnotes, it is more interesting in concept than in reality.
I've read Inferno, and if there's a stronger word than "agree" on the footnotes part, that's where I stand. Unless you're an expert on who was who in Florence in Dante's era.
T-Rex fixes great works of fiction: [link]
For the Inferno, the concept of the punishments as
contra passo
is intriguing (same in Purgatorio, but with the added ability to change levels in order to ascend), but Fred Pete is totally correct. Without knowing who the hell was in power and the internecine struggles of Florentine life, the people themselves and the stories they tell are very meh.
I really like My Antonia, and Willa Cather in general.
I hated
My Antonia.
It seemed to be a book told entirely in summary rather than scene.
I know I read My Antonia. I think I read The Awakening. I remember almost nothing about either one. (I just looked up a summary of The Awakening to try and work out if I had or not. The ending sounds awfully familiar, so: probably.)
I also read Beloved & Macbeth & Handmaid's Tale. Those I remember.
I also hated
The Awakening.
I don't think I liked
Beloved,
but I do love
Macbeth
and
The Handmaid's Tale.
I hated My Antonia.
What?! Quit having wrong opinions.
Bored the crap out of me, man.
Bored the crap out of me, man.
But it's got plows and dried mushrooms and immigrant girls! I fail to see what's boring about that.