Love isn't brains, children, it's blood, blood screaming inside you to work its will.

Spike ,'Sleeper'


Literary Buffistas 3: Don't Parse the Blurb, Dear.

There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."


Amy - Sep 14, 2009 11:30:49 am PDT #10027 of 28384
Because books.

I'm just annoyed because I dislike her books so much.

Heh. I've never actually read her, but I remember when her first book came out.

However, it's now obvious that my Nora Roberts books compose almost 1/3rd of the collection.

Of romances I've held onto, her trilogies and Patricia Gaffney's old historicals are the big winners.


Aims - Sep 14, 2009 11:32:40 am PDT #10028 of 28384
Shit's all sorts of different now.

NR takes up about the same amount of rrom on my shelves, too. Even more when you add in the JD Robb's.

I'm curious Steph, what is it that you don't care for about Jane Green's writing?


Barb - Sep 14, 2009 11:38:17 am PDT #10029 of 28384
“Not dead yet!”

Not Steph, but one of the things that infuriated me about her early books at least, was that they seemed to epitomize everything bad about the chick lit genre-- all the labels, the shallowness, the sheer vapidness of how her characters treated relationships. Jemima J was like the dark side of Bridget Jones and oh, how I hated her.

Worst of all, it didn't feel as if the character really learned anything of value by the end of the story.


Aims - Sep 14, 2009 11:44:23 am PDT #10030 of 28384
Shit's all sorts of different now.

That makes sense. Babyville, in particular, seems to bring out the worst of the chick lit labels and stereotypical women.

Bookends is my favorite, with To Have and To Hold right after.

Jane Green is one of my favorite authors to read. I do not by any means think she is wonderful literature, but when I need escapist, no-brainer reading material, she's who I go to. Her and Sophie Kinsella.


Kathy A - Sep 14, 2009 11:46:50 am PDT #10031 of 28384
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil

The other big names on my romance shelves are Linda Howard, Kay Hooper, Jayne Ann Krentz/Amanda Quick/Amanda Glass (got rid of all the Jayne Castle SF romances), and Robin D. Owens (kept her SF/romance titles, mostly because I love her portrayal of pet familiars who communicate with their humans), but I only have 8-15 books of each, as opposed to NR's dozens.

The authors I wish had published more are Jessica Bryan (terrific mermaid romance), Lee Damon (not a big name, but the few books I have I really treasure for wonderful characters), and Nancy Block (who only published the one book I know of, a hilarious timetravel pirate romance called "Once Upon a Pirate" that I highly recommend if you can find it--it's long out of print).


Amy - Sep 14, 2009 11:50:55 am PDT #10032 of 28384
Because books.

when I need escapist, no-brainer reading material

Nora's my girl for that. Not that her trilogies are brainless at all, really, but I know what's going to happen -- three couples, an overarching plot, and good snarky dialogue and decent sex.


Kathy A - Sep 14, 2009 11:52:43 am PDT #10033 of 28384
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil

Also, really well-drawn men. She really gets male characters in a way that most romance writers don't.


Amy - Sep 14, 2009 11:54:24 am PDT #10034 of 28384
Because books.

Also, really well-drawn men. She really gets male characters in a way that most romance writers don't.

SO MUCH THIS, I have to asscap it.


Steph L. - Sep 14, 2009 11:54:27 am PDT #10035 of 28384
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

one of the things that infuriated me about her early books at least, was that they seemed to epitomize everything bad about the chick lit genre-- all the labels, the shallowness, the sheer vapidness of how her characters treated relationships. Jemima J was like the dark side of Bridget Jones and oh, how I hated her.

Worst of all, it didn't feel as if the character really learned anything of value by the end of the story.

That pretty much sums it up, right down to the Jemima J. That's a horrible book.

Plus her characters are the very definition of "two-dimensional."


Steph L. - Sep 14, 2009 11:55:36 am PDT #10036 of 28384
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

when I need escapist, no-brainer reading material

Jennifer Crusie for me.