My whole life, I've never loved anything else.

Oz ,'Him'


Fan Fiction: Writers, Readers, and Enablers  

This thread is for fanfic recs, links, and discussion, but not for actual posting of fanfic.


Steph L. - Apr 13, 2003 9:24:05 pm PDT #4743 of 10000
I look more rad than Lutheranism

I look for fiction about -- generally -- people who are fucked-up and yet manage to find...not redemption, that's not the situation I mean, but a sense of peace, or being settled in the world with their fucked-upped-ness.

Does that make sense?

Basically, thematically, how shit can grow gorgeous flowers.


Amber B. - Apr 13, 2003 9:24:23 pm PDT #4744 of 10000
I'm beginning to understand this now. It's all about the journey, isn't it?

Have any of the recent articles mentioned Clark/Lex?

You know, I was kind of suprised that the article in Bitch didn't mention them at all. Mulder/Skinner, Janeway/Seven, Buffy/Willow, and Kirk/Spock are the pairings I remember being referenced.

Asking why people in general write slash or anything else is going to get you dozens of different answers. I don't mind the question, myself -- what gets me uncomfortable is when someone who doesn't write tries to answer it -- or when a writer tries to answer for all writers. That never ends well. We all have our own reasons for writing, and those reasons may change over time, and from show to show.

This was actually the thing I liked about the article - she didn't try to give one absolute answer about what people find so appealing about slash. She acknowledged that for every reader and writer the reasons would be different.

For the most part, slash isn't really my cup of tea. I've enjoyed Anna S.'s recent Spike/Xander stories, and Mulder/Krycek will always have a special place in my heart, and I have a major soft spot for a well written Buffy/Faith, but I usually prefer het or gen. And I've come to accept that it's not because I'm homophobic, or narrow-minded, or unimaginitive. I just have different storytelling kinks.


UTTAD - Apr 13, 2003 9:24:48 pm PDT #4745 of 10000
Strawberry disappointment.

See the thing with American Gods, as much as Neil is a hero ... Terry Pratchett kicked his ass black and blue with Small Gods.
He did it first, better, and funnier.

And with no slash. :-p


P.M. Marc - Apr 13, 2003 9:26:08 pm PDT #4746 of 10000
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

I look for fiction about -- generally -- people who are fucked-up and yet manage to find...not redemption, that's not the situation I mean, but a sense of peace, or being settled in the world with their fucked-upped-ness.

I like fiction about people who are fucked up, and sometimes find train tracks. But, yeah, I like that, too. A sort of resolution that, while not always happy, at least allows for the possibilty of contentment.


UTTAD - Apr 13, 2003 9:27:38 pm PDT #4747 of 10000
Strawberry disappointment.

Steph L: I look for fiction about -- generally -- people who are fucked-up and yet manage to find...not redemption, that's not the situation I mean, but a sense of peace, or being settled in the world with their fucked-upped-ness

Have you read The Gap series by Stephen Donaldson, because if the above is your criteria, then that series pretty well has your bases covered.


askye - Apr 13, 2003 9:28:59 pm PDT #4748 of 10000
Thrive to spite them

The only Terry Pratchett I've read is Good Omens.

Also, I did forget to say that another thing I like about slash is the sex.

I'm pretty diverse in what I read. I haven't read a lot...many..okay most...of the classics, I managed to get through high school without doing that (go to 3 high schools in 4 years and you too can get a spotty education). Plus I was a slacker and only did stuff I was interested in, so in my English Lit section I did my paper on Frankenstein.

Edited because I lost my point...

I'll read almost anything if it looks in anyway interesting, not just the plot but---oh! neat cover!.


Steph L. - Apr 13, 2003 9:31:33 pm PDT #4749 of 10000
I look more rad than Lutheranism

Have you read The Gap series by Stephen Donaldson, because if the above is your criteria, then that series pretty well has your bases covered.

No, but I have now made a note of it -- thanks!


P.M. Marc - Apr 13, 2003 9:36:42 pm PDT #4750 of 10000
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

Oh, lots of Hardy when I was fourteen, too.

I think that as writers, we (duh) output a lot of what we ingest and digest from the shows. So, if the plots all blur together for you (which they often do for me, at least with the MotW type episodes), you're not likely to want to write plot, at least not that sort of plot.

I still take issue with the X is harder to write than Y with any of it. For some writers, plot may be the easiest thing for them to write. I've seen as much bad emotional/character driven writing as I've seen plot-driven writing, so I don't think that you can really say one is easier, on the whole, than the other.

Plot may require more note-taking (this would be why my plotty stuff remains unfinished--lot of research, some spreadsheets, dependency charts, etc., that I need to finish up), but sex takes longer to write, at least for me. Six of one, half dozen of the other.


Vonnie K - Apr 13, 2003 9:41:41 pm PDT #4751 of 10000
Kiss me, my girl, before I'm sick.

I have to admit, I'll choose a well-written and constructed plotty story over the best-written relationship story. But that's just me.

Nope, it's not just you.

It's a matter of taste, as are most things. I love plotty gen. I live for plotty gen. I'm frequently bored by relationship stories where the primary end point is to get two characters together, unless the romance is happening within the context of a larger story. Not that I dislike romance per se--it's just that a writer has to work harder for me to get into a shippy story, with lyrical prose, superlative characterizations, etc. than another writer who already has a rollicking plot to offer. And it takes even *more* work on the writer's part to sell me on a UC pairing, het or slash (with a few exceptions for my particular soft spots, e.g. cough Faith/Wes cough.)

On 'hey, this is just me and my issues' category, I don't like too much explicit sex in my stories. I like the UST and the undercurrents and things left unsaid, and often skim over the smut. This is in contrast to a lot of readers and excellent writers who write fanfic to explore emotional/sexual subtexts suggested on the show. Which is one of the main reasons cited when people are asked why they read/write fic. It just doesn't rank as high on my list of reasons for reading fic.

I can't say, not being a writer, whether it's harder to write plot or sex scenes. What I *can* say is, it's deuced harder for me to find a satisfying plotty gen than a well-written relationship story, at least in the particular fandom I'm reading in right now (Stargate SG-1.)


UTTAD - Apr 13, 2003 9:44:53 pm PDT #4752 of 10000
Strawberry disappointment.

S'weird for me. When I write a fic, I have an idea of how it ends, then wonder how it starts. When I get that, I start to write. The dialogue just happens, and where that dialogue takes me, I write scenes, until I get to where the story is meant to end. And badaboom, the story ends. Every so often I'll have a couple of scenes I want to be in the story. Other than that, I let my nose lead me.