I actually think I'm ready to start beta-ing/critiquing again, which is not a place my head's been in for a good long while. In some ways, it would actually be easier to do it for someone that I don't know very well, since I'd be able to be a bit more dispassionate about the piece itself -- which is not to say "be harsh" since with writers I like personally a lot, I tend to like their writing more than I should, which is not what a proper critique needs, and then there's the worry about hurting their feelings inadvertantly....

You should only ever hurt someone's feelings on purpose. That's the true definition of 'lady'.

I was rereading old betas recently, and I discovered two things: (1) I betaed a lot of really good stuff over the years, and a good 30% of if was never published/finished; and (2) it's a million times easier to beta with Word and track changes or colored fonts than it is to do in plaintext.

Not that I'm not still devoted to plaintext as a publishing medium, but holy fucksticks. I'm surprised people weren't publishing with beta notes still in the final versions of their stories.

I know *g*. I send you an assload of it.

Take that back! You so do not.

I was just gonna say!

Hey! You take that back too!

Crazy women.

I'm surprised people weren't publishing with beta notes still in the final versions of their stories.

See, I don't get that. I NEVER use the file that went through beta as the file that I post. It's more complicated, but I sit with the beta in one window and the story in the other, and make the changes. Besides, I might have changed the story since I sent it to beta.

As for colored comments, it's useful, but then not everyone uses Word. When I work with Marasmus, it's a problem, because she's on a Mac and the only thing we can use is .txt files.

Speaking of fic, I have badfic in my inbox this morning. Not just badfic, either, but bad songfic.

I blame Shrift and Dana. Dammit.

See, I don't get that. I NEVER use the file that went through beta as the file that I post. It's more complicated, but I sit with the beta in one window and the story in the other, and make the changes. Besides, I might have changed the story since I sent it to beta.

Anything long, I have two beta passes at least, so I do it this way.

What with being out of town this past week, I forgot to say that Bright Shiny Objects has been updated. I feel kind of sheepish because I was too disorganized to send the recs in this month, so the update is short on Jossverse stuff (which is my part most of the time.) There were some excellent Firefly fic I wanted to rec, which will have to wait until the next update.

There is one Gilmore Girls story (a gorgeous Luke/Lorelei) in that update that tweaks my heartstring just so. I'd be all kind of fannish about GG, if only it weren't airing at the same time as Buffy. Sigh.

Oh, and someone on GO recc'd this cute Stargate fic yesterday, which I loved. It made me burst out into laughter several times.

Edited, as usual, for stoopid grammar.

I blame Shrift and Dana.

Actually, that one's my fault. I didn't want to, believe me...

USA Today on fan fiction. Oy.

I NEVER use the file that went through beta as the file that I post. It's more complicated, but I sit with the beta in one window and the story in the other, and make the changes. Besides, I might have changed the story since I sent it to beta.

Me too. That's how I work.