Angel: How're you feeling? Faith: Like I did mushrooms and got eaten by a bear.

'A Hole in the World'


Fan Fiction: Writers, Readers, and Enablers  

This thread is for fanfic recs, links, and discussion, but not for actual posting of fanfic.


Fay - Dec 22, 2002 1:16:21 pm PST #1833 of 10000
"Fuck Western ideologically-motivated gender identification!" Sulu gasped, and came.

Ah.

...other than the RPF I wrote about Ple for the LJ slash. Huh. But - not the same? Or at least, it doesn't feel the same. As RL said - that it was more like a gift for a friend, and a joke/not joke, um, more like a flight of fancy. A very, very pretentious flight of fancy and an exercise in meta. Without, I think, much tittilation. But I know you folks have a tradition of writing the Spike/Bitch slash, in the past? And it was like that. Which isn't, quite, the same as the LotR RPF, or the Puppyslash.

Or is it?

Perhaps I'm deceiving myself here. Huh.


P.M. Marc - Dec 22, 2002 1:19:19 pm PST #1834 of 10000
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

I don't read RPF, and I try not to find out about the actors when I can, because I would find it all too easy to cross that line into writing RPF.

I do learn some things about actors, but oddly, if anything, it totally discourages me from any RPF leanings in the actor-fic direction.

The sparkley boys, they've got these characters they play on stage, with the same names as them, but they're still characters, or at least that's what it seems like. I don't want to know about them, the people. I'm sure they're lovely people, with actual thoughts and opinions. But what you see on-stage seems no more real to me than the Monkees.

Same with Political fic. I've read some Thatcher slash, I'll admit. I almost wrote some HK a moment ago.

My lines are distinct, but very personal.


§ ita § - Dec 22, 2002 1:20:20 pm PST #1835 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

But I know you folks have a tradition of writing the Spike/Bitch slash, in the past? And it was like that. Which isn't, quite, the same as the LotR RPF, or the Puppyslash.

Or is it?

I think it's the idea of consent, here. Me, I'm uncomfortable enough with the whole idea that I never let myself be porned. I did have some good fight scenes written with me in, though, and I like those. I just wouldn't make a habit of having them written about me.

Which is in no small way why I happily write myself into most of the fic I've done. How consentier can you get?


Rebecca Lizard - Dec 22, 2002 1:26:52 pm PST #1836 of 10000
You sip / say it's your crazy / straw say it's you're crazy / as you bicycle your soul / with beauty in your basket

But I know you folks have a tradition of writing the Spike/Bitch slash, in the past? And it was like that. Which isn't, quite, the same as the LotR RPF, or the Puppyslash.

Or is it?

I think it's the idea of consent, here.

Wrod, ita. For me, when it's consent, *it's not fic*. The idea of non-consent (or non-specific consent, maybe, at least) is integral to the definition of fic, for me.

Is there a line for you, RL, where the adrenaline rush won't make it interesting? Is there a genre that would make you stand up and scream DON'T WRITE THAT!!!

Yeah.

When it's badly written. Then I either go EWWW! or God. That's boring. Probably both.

But if it's well-written RPF? I guess, I guess I'd just have that mix of "this is good writing" and "this is BAD WRONG BAD and a little bit boring (*)" and the intellectual appreciation of the adrenaline-rushing bit.

(*) OK. Because, yes, I'm thinking about it, and I can't imagine really *being* *interested* in RPF. Which is very puzzling to me. I'm trying to articulate why, but it feels a little disingenuous to say "I'm not invested in the characters, the way I am Willow or Lex", because that's certainly not stopped me from falling in love with new original-fic characters, or, say, Wax Jism's The Faculty series I devoured last night. I just... this is so weird. I can't explain! I'm thinking about anyone, Alyson Hannigan, Michael Rosenbaum, the fucking Pope-- I'm presenting myself with hypothetical gorgeously-written stories, about real people, and can't make myself really get interested. *Huh*.

So it's true, that I do appreciate them on an intellectual level; but it seems to be true that that's only a very *abstract* thing. I can appreciate that they're being done. I don't, however, seem to be very interested in the actual stories.

[edited for formatting 'cause I'm a dork]


Fay - Dec 22, 2002 1:28:06 pm PST #1837 of 10000
"Fuck Western ideologically-motivated gender identification!" Sulu gasped, and came.

blink

Ah. Okay - something spooky happened with your post there, but it's all fine now. As you were.


Rebecca Lizard - Dec 22, 2002 1:29:20 pm PST #1838 of 10000
You sip / say it's your crazy / straw say it's you're crazy / as you bicycle your soul / with beauty in your basket

Sorry. Did you see I edited? Cut-and-paste error. I'm an idiot.


Am-Chau Yarkona - Dec 22, 2002 1:29:25 pm PST #1839 of 10000
I bop to Wittgenstein. -- Nutty

This is where writing attitudes differ, I suppose. I write about characters I know. I know it's a fantasy, but I feel that if I met Spike (or any of the other characters I slash/write) I could guess what he was going to say next and possibly how he'd move as he said it.

I talk to these characters, after all. I basically role-play them. It's very strange for me to do this with a real person, because I have this little nag at the back of my mind that says 'wrong! That might not be how they are' and I just have to ignore that and keep going. And I don't want to do that with a person whose permission I don't have, because I... I... I have a squick about it. Can't explain better than that. It has to be said that when I talk to people in real life, I sit there and I'm fantasing, wondering 'how do they behave when they're not with me? How do those two look in bed? What did he have for breakfast this morning?'

So, for example, a few years ago when I was very into 'The Goon Show', I'd be thinking (and thank the Goddess I hadn't found out about writing RPS, because I'd bet if I'd known about it, the world would now suffer from Milligan/Sellers slash), 'what did they do when they were recording the show? What did they think...?' etc., and I got a little flash of pleasure from reading Harry Secombe's autobiography, and wondering about him and Myra in bed, and the fact that I still know his wife's name scares me a little. And then, because the actors are stronger characters than the characters (storng though they are), I role-played the actors, and I'd wonder even then 'Is it less wrong to pretend you're Peter Sellers, because he's dead, than to pretend you're Spike Milligan, because (at that time) he's still alive?'

It's a strange problem, and not one I know the answer to.


Fay - Dec 22, 2002 1:30:48 pm PST #1840 of 10000
"Fuck Western ideologically-motivated gender identification!" Sulu gasped, and came.

Wow. Wrod to the big differences in pov.


Am-Chau Yarkona - Dec 22, 2002 1:32:42 pm PST #1841 of 10000
I bop to Wittgenstein. -- Nutty

Wrod to the big differences in pov.

I have to say it. Wrod.


§ ita § - Dec 22, 2002 1:34:09 pm PST #1842 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Is the rush you get from the idea of RPF because it's naughty? What else gives you that rush, and if Orlando and Viggo stood up and said "Yup, that's exactly what happened -- good job, carry on." would the frisson disappear?