'Out Of Gas'
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Yeah, I've got a Keaton thing, have had it since I saw Sherlock Jr in a college film class....
Anyway: the falling house facade was a "get it right/one shot" deal. Keaton very very carefully measured out the angles with surveyor's instruments, because even if it was a fake facade falling, it still weighed considerable and could have easily killed him -- and then to stand there, ACTING, as it fell.
I don't think we've seen a action star of his caliber until Jackie Chan came along.
I don't think we've seen a action star of his caliber until Jackie Chan came along.
And at least Jackie gets to have facial expressions. Keaton's deadpan is a thing of wonder. I think Jackie may have broken more of his bones, though.
What's really cool about Keaton's acting is that he'd been onstage with vaudeville since he was a small child, and vaudeville acting is all about the broad gesture and loud declamation, not at all subtle. But in a very short time, he took to the way-more intimate acting to a movie camera, and took on a stoneface aspect that is actually very expressive. It's a whole 'less is more' approach, which renders his persona still easily appreciated by modern audiences, whereas the contemporary theatrically-influenced acting of the 20s put on film really takes some getting used to.
OK, I think I've used up my allotment of Buster-fangirlish glee for the day....
To tie them together, Jackie Chan did a stunt like the falling facade one in homage to Keaton.
me too, P-C! Fellowship was my least favorite.
I think that's mine too!
In fact, I'm told that the wreckage is still there in the ravine to this day.
I think they were there until WWII.
But in a very short time, he took to the way-more intimate acting to a movie camera, and took on a stoneface aspect that is actually very expressive.
Heh. One thing I noticed was that were no close-ups. But that was a 1927 thing. As for the acting, I guess I was also surprised that it wasn't broader throughout. With the exception of one scene in the beginning, no one did that hilariously over-the-top stuff you see in the older silent films and silent film parodies.
When Hec gets up, I'm going to send him in to tell the story of the secret shame of Buster Keaton that almost ruined an entire movie, 'cause he tells it better than me. But it's very funny and cool, and it says a great deal about him as a proto-action star.
Oh dear. I don't even know where to start.
Uh oh. I didn't mean to denigrate the film in any way. I'm just saying that while it's clearly a great movie, for 1927, the greatness is generally in the filmmaking, and not in the story or characters or anything. It's not emotionally affecting (besides the fact that it sure feels weird to be rooting for the Confederates), but it's fun.
Me too! Yay. And I think I remember that we both hated Raising Arizona. We're kindred spirits!
Totally! Raising Arizona is ridiculously overpraised!
::high five::
I'm still irked that the Coens never bothered to see Tempe, Arizona. Other than that, I suppose I would think it's kind of funny, but no "Big Lebowski", for instance.
Raising Arizona is ridiculously overpraised!
Cue to say: NUH and UH! Best of the Coen Bros!