Aaand on quiz #1: 23/30
Oh, and Vonnie:
The one with all the 'copters? No freakin' clue.
It's Black Hawk Down
Giles ,'Beneath You'
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Aaand on quiz #1: 23/30
Oh, and Vonnie:
The one with all the 'copters? No freakin' clue.
It's Black Hawk Down
I apparently need a hobby.
On movie quiz #3: 11/28 and no clue on the rest
On movie quiz #2: 28/30 fairly easily
On movie quiz #1: 17/30 but I feel I know more
I apparently should not be teaching film.
On the original quiz I got 23, though I call it into question since there are only 3 movies #27 could be and none of them (nor any alternates of the titles) got a green result.
Matt, the answer is the name of the trilogy as a whole.
I tried that when I was taking the quiz and it didn't work.
The string it's looking for is "the lord of the rings"
You probably left out the article.
I just saw Match Point. You would never guess it was a Woody Allen film; it's quite a departure from everything else I've seen of his (I haven't seen Crimes and Misdemeanors ). Well crafted and artfully done, but I'm not sure what I think about it.
I was intrigued by the way it was shot, though. It gives the impression that the camera is just eavesdropping on these people's lives. I thought about how hard it must be to consciously shoot like that without...making it look consciously shot.
Man I loved that movie.
It gives the impression that the camera is just eavesdropping on these people's lives. I thought about how hard it must be to consciously shoot like that without...making it look consciously shot.
That's how The Office and Arrested Development are shot.
I see those as more of the documentary style where the camera is a character. In Match Point, the camera is just kind of there, not making any sort of comment. The editing is part of it, too, the way you get short scenes that don't really have anything to do with anything but are just a snapshot of what the character is doing at a particular time. It's a technique that irritated me in Lost in Translation for some reason but worked for me here. I could get into the slow burn much more easily. I'm not sure what it is. I'm more fascinated by the filmmaking than the film itself.
I really liked Ebert's review. He does acknowledge that the movie is short on character development, which I noticed as well. He also quite astutely points out that it's basically a noir flick.