I dislike rotoscope animation intensely. It's Uncanny Valley territory for me.
I stopped reading Spiderman comics before Venom came along. Maybe I should go do some research. What are the "Ultimate" versions?
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
I dislike rotoscope animation intensely. It's Uncanny Valley territory for me.
I stopped reading Spiderman comics before Venom came along. Maybe I should go do some research. What are the "Ultimate" versions?
They're kind of "modern" retellings of the Marvel canon. They started, what, four or five years ago? But everything is reset in the Ultimate universe, so the writers get to do things differently yet still tell some rockin' stories.
Ultimate Spider-Man is written by Brian Michael Bendis, who is awesome and horribly prolific like nobody's business.
I dislike rotoscope animation intensely. It's Uncanny Valley territory for me.
I get an Uncanny Valley feeling sometimes from Bakshi's rotoscoping, though I still like it. I thought he used it to good effect, rotoscoping over footage from WWI and II for Wizards and Lord of the Rings (though I dislike some of the other things he did with his LotR).
I don't get that Uncanny Valley feeling from Linklater's rotoscoping technique. I think that style really suits the films it's been/being used on.
I think that style really suits the films it's been/being used on.
Totally. There are a few things in Scanner that I can't imagine being done as well with live action, but you also get to watch real actors' real performances. There are some really subtle visual effects achieved just in the way that he plays with depth perception here.
(I thoroughly loathed Waking Life, but that wasn't the fault of the animation. I thought the animation was beautiful, and it was a shame it was being wasted on such a monumentally pretentious piece of crap.)
Guess I'll check out Scanner. And Ultimate.
I don't have time for my job.
I dislike rotoscope animation intensely. It's Uncanny Valley territory for me.
Yes, this. It also makes me feel like the animators are just being lazy. I absolutely hated it in the Bakashi LotR (not that there was much to like in it) and those current commericals that use it drive me up the wall.
Ultimate Spider-Man is written by Brian Michael Bendis, who is awesome and horribly prolific like nobody's business.
Yup. I absolutely love Ultimate Spider-man. It had a brief slump for few issues awhile back, but other than that it's been consistently really good. (Unlike, say, Ultimate X-Men which seems to be all over the place in both art and writing, but it manages to get better again every time I start thinking about dropping it.)
It also makes me feel like the animators are just being lazy.
Having done a little rotoscoping in the past, I cannot stress enough how strongly I disagree with this. It's hard.
Having done a little rotoscoping in the past, I cannot stress enough how strongly I disagree with this. It's hard.
I'll take your word for it.
ION, I'm not sure what to think of this: [link]
Hee. The writer's written a lot of Smallville and some BSG episodes (one good, one craptacular, and one finale).
Dude! I love Mark Verheiden.
Or rather, his work on Superman was pretty effin' solid, though the art on his first issue of Superman/Batman made it hard for me to actually read the story.