Zoe: Next time we smuggle stock, let's make it something smaller. Wash: Yeah, we should start dealing in those black-market beagles.

'Safe'


Buffista Movies 5: Development Hell  

A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.


Vonnie K - May 12, 2006 8:03:16 am PDT #1728 of 10001
Kiss me, my girl, before I'm sick.

I actually have His Dark Materials books, but I've heard so much about Pullman's abrasive anti-Christianity crusade that I've been reluctant to start on the books. Not that I'm that religious myself, but I dislike knowing that the author/director has an agenda to push in advance. If there is an agenda, I'd rather discover it myself on my own.


Volans - May 12, 2006 8:11:17 am PDT #1729 of 10001
move out and draw fire

Well, with The Golden Compass, you'd only need to read about 2 pages before twigging to that particular agenda.


Tom Scola - May 12, 2006 8:59:04 am PDT #1730 of 10001
Remember that the frontier of the Rebellion is everywhere. And even the smallest act of insurrection pushes our lines forward.

Sony isn't showing advanced screenings of The DaVinci Code: [link]


Jessica - May 12, 2006 9:00:29 am PDT #1731 of 10001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

Well, there goes my only chance of seeing it.


Strega - May 12, 2006 9:01:31 am PDT #1732 of 10001

I don't think he's so much anti-Christian as pro-atheist. I don't remember anything in the books that's attacking Christianity in particular. Religion in general, sure.

But I read them for the agenda, so I may not be the best judge.


§ ita § - May 12, 2006 9:06:42 am PDT #1733 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

It felt like the Papacy was being assaulted to me, but my memory is fuzzy.

I liked the books well enough until the stridency accumulated past my breaking point.

Still kept reading, because, well, I'd started, and I only stop when I'm bored.


evil jimi - May 12, 2006 9:07:21 am PDT #1734 of 10001
Lurching from one disaster to the next.

From IMDB:

'Da Vinci Code' Sparks Indian Riots

Controversial new movie adaptation The Da Vinci Code has prompted religious protests in the Indian city of Mumbai (Bombay). Hundreds of Catholic stalwarts yesterday gathered outside a convent school in the city in a bid to stop the film's release next week , blasting it as an attack on their faith. Members of the Catholic Secular Forum (CSF) have taken offence to the movie's depiction of Catholic group Opus Dei as corrupt, out-dated and at the centre of a cover-up of the truth about Jesus Christ. Csf general secretary Joseph Dias says, "Activists will go on a fast unto death if the government fails to take action against anti-Christian movies. You can't make fiction on a religious figure. Tempers are already running quite high and there's no way of saying what could happen if the movie is released." In a statement, the group added: "The Da Vinci Code is offensive as it hit certain basic foundations of the religion." The protest is the second in a week by the CSF after Tuesday saw approximately one hundred demonstrators take to the streets outside a Mumbai church and burn copies of the Dan Brown novel.


Matt the Bruins fan - May 12, 2006 9:11:13 am PDT #1735 of 10001
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

Activists will go on a fast unto death if the government fails to take action against anti-Christian movies. You can't make fiction on a religious figure.

My immediate urge to know if anyone's scheduling the Jesus-heavy episodes of South Park to air there pretty much brands me as evil, right?


evil jimi - May 12, 2006 9:13:10 am PDT #1736 of 10001
Lurching from one disaster to the next.

Also from IMDB:

Tucker Becomes Highest-Paid Actor, Says Report

New Line has agreed to pay Chris Tucker $25 million to appear in Rush Hour 3, making him the highest-paid actor in Hollywood, according to FoxNews.com's Roger Friedman. Friedman commented that the figure is all the more remarkable considering the fact that Tucker has starred in only two other films -- both of them the Rush Hour movies. Friedman observed that Rush Hour 2 holds the record for the highest gross of any comedy and that the total worldwide take for the first two films is about $600 million. Both the previous Rush Hour also star Jackie Chan alongside Tucker.

This is fucking ridiculous, and begs two questions.

1) Who actually went to see either Rush Hour, or Rush Hour 2, for Chris Tucker???

2) Who actually avoided either Rush Hour, or Rush Hour 2 because of Chris Tucker?

The only reason to see either movie is Jackie Chan but since Chan isn't given the chance to properly strut his stuff, it's still not a compelling reason.


§ ita § - May 12, 2006 9:15:55 am PDT #1737 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I thought Rush Hour was absolutely hysterical, and loved it to bits. I chalk that up to both of the leads.

The sequel was ho hum, which is why I'm surprised he's getting this much for the third. But it's obvious that the general public doesn't agree with me.

However, if they can't make it without him (and I agree they can't), $600m is nothing to sneeze at.