I hate to think what the 20th Century pro arugment might be.
Mal ,'Heart Of Gold'
Spike's Bitches 28: For the Safety of Puppies...and Christmas!
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
I think it's not impossible, but like I said, I wouldn't want to do it off the cuff. But I didn't mean to sound like I was lecturing.
I think the contexts are too different. Race relations are not what they used to be, even when they're bad. Emancipation, education, civil rights battles, john crow...I attribute them all a huge impact.
Race relations are not what they used to be, even when they're bad
Of course of course, but I think the general conception of "back then" (not your's, ita) doesn't get that, for example, that anti-micegination laws were passed because people WERE miceginating, they were miceginating up a storm.
that anti-miscegenation laws were passed because people WERE miscegenating, they were miscegenating up a storm.
That was the most valuable thing I learned from a queer history seminar I took at SFSU. And it applies generally. If governments were passing laws against stuff, it generally means it was going on.
For the record, there were people who contemporaneously protested things like that.
For the record, if I were the teacher who assigned such a project, the letter of protest better sound more like Fox and Penn than King and Kennedy or risk public ridicule.
if I were the teacher who assigned such a project, the letter of protest better sound more like Fox and Penn than King and Kennedy or risk public ridicule.
No argument there.
If governments were passing laws against stuff, it generally means it was going on.
The bible too. It was a real 'ah hah' moment when I realized that.
Oooooooh, fun thought: House as history prof, assigning projects like these just for the fun of snarking at poorly-thought-out responses.
heh heh heh
I'd be watching, for sure.