Tracy: 'When you can't run, you crawl... and when you can't crawl, when you can't do that--' Zoe: 'You find someone to carry you.'

'The Message'


Natter 41: Why Do I Click on ita's Links?!  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Eddie - Dec 20, 2005 12:24:17 pm PST #3689 of 10002
Your tag here.

Can you tell it's almost tax time?


tommyrot - Dec 20, 2005 12:25:35 pm PST #3690 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

The cool thing about expressing such problems as a pair of fractions is that it works for all sorts of % problems.

Say you have 18 toasters. That's 57% of the number of toasters that you need. How many toasters do you need?

57% means 57/100. You have 18 out of a total of some unknown number. So,

57/100 = 18/x


§ ita § - Dec 20, 2005 12:32:52 pm PST #3691 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

The cool thing about expressing such problems as a pair of fractions is that it works for all sorts of % problems.

I'm not denying that formulae are more flexible, etc.

I love the math.

However, not everyone does--so if someone uses the term "math idiot" I'm gonna provide a method to solve that problem.

Question about teapots. The assumption in design is that you serve the whole pot at once, right? Otherwise the second pouring is too strong and old. What if you're one person that wants two (consecutive) cups of the same brew?


Scrappy - Dec 20, 2005 12:34:02 pm PST #3692 of 10002
Life moves pretty fast. You don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.

I just wanted to get the answer with the least amount of button-presses on my calculator.


Gudanov - Dec 20, 2005 12:35:11 pm PST #3693 of 10002
Coding and Sleeping

You know what, this is old, but I heard about it again and realized Scalia is sort of scary. From a dissent in the Kentucky ten commandments case.

"If religion in the public forum had to be entirely nondenominational, there could be no religion in the public forum at all. One cannot say the word "God," or "the Almighty," one cannot offer public supplication or thanksgiving, without contradicting the beliefs of some people that there are many gods, or that God or the gods pay no attention to human affairs. With respect to public acknowledgment of religious belief, it is entirely clear from our nation's historical practices that the Establishment Clause permits this disregard of polytheists and believers in unconcerned deities, just as it permits the disregard of devout atheists. The Thanksgiving Proclamation issued by George Washington at the instance of the First Congress was scrupulously nondenominational—but it was monotheistic.

Historical practices thus demonstrate that there is a distance between the acknowledgment of a single Creator and the establishment of a religion. The three most popular religions in the United States, Christianity, Judaism, and Islam—which combined account for 97.7 percent of all believers—are monotheistic. All of them, moreover (Islam included), believe that the Ten Commandments were given by God to Moses, and are divine prescriptions for a virtuous life. Publicly honoring the Ten Commandments is thus indistinguishable, insofar as discriminating against other religions is concerned, from publicly honoring God. Both practices are recognized across such a broad and diverse range of the population—from Christians to Muslims—that they cannot be reasonably understood as a government endorsement of a particular religious viewpoint.

I got it from [link]

The gist seems to be that it's okay to disregard atheists and any religion without Moses.


§ ita § - Dec 20, 2005 12:37:23 pm PST #3694 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I just wanted to get the answer with the least amount of button-presses on my calculator.

Eh, you already had the right answer. So now you're the meat of philosophy debate, and there's nothing you can do about it.

Gah. There's a bullet point in someone else's meeting minutes that neither of us can decipher. Somehow it's become my job to puzzle it out...


sarameg - Dec 20, 2005 12:37:59 pm PST #3695 of 10002

Take the tea leaves out? Though I don't think that addresses the "old" factor.


sarameg - Dec 20, 2005 12:38:38 pm PST #3696 of 10002

Or! I know! Drink faster!


tommyrot - Dec 20, 2005 12:39:29 pm PST #3697 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Eh, you already had the right answer.

You had the right answer with you all the time. Just click your heels together...

Or maybe the answer is in your heart.


§ ita § - Dec 20, 2005 12:47:08 pm PST #3698 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Or maybe the answer is in your heart.

Don't let it crowd out the magic, though.

Though I don't think that addresses the "old" factor.

No, it's fine--but your traditional teapot doesn't allow for that. I'd need a two-cup teapot with a large area for the leaves, but easily removable, and it has to be well insulated so the second cup is still pretty hot.

Drink faster!

The second cup will always be stronger than the first, though.