Whether you think about it or not, your unlocked LJ posts are totally available to an audience not personally known to you.
You're misunderstanding me. What I'm saying is that Allyson's not
blogging
(regardless of software platform) because she's not presenting content directed at people who don't know her. Not that they can't read her, but that this is of little to no value to an editor, unless they're trying to be really nosy and profile the person Allyson. Which will fail because of the whole friendslock thing anyway.
eta: Oh look. Sumi was more concise. But that.
Hi Perkins!
Good job, Laura.
Tom, I accepted your dare. Do I win?
Not that they can't read her, but that this is of little to no value to an editor, unless they're trying to be really nosy and profile the person Allyson. Which will fail because of the whole friendslock thing anyway.
Well, sure, I guess so. I still don't see the big whoop.
Late for meeting, ugh.
Go ahead. Click it. I dare you
Is it wrong that my first reaction was "the bunnies are eating each other"?
(take that statement as you will)
Tom's still not on my list of scary linkers.
I still don't see the big whoop.
I don't think there's a whoop, I just think there's a misunderstanding of content.
