Some of us have been shunning her for years, due to her WRONGness about another issue. But we luvs her despite her WRONGness and forgive her.
*BAP*
Also? I'm sorry she's dead.
So there.
I'm glad Boone's gone, though. I think Michael showed REMARKABLE restraint not murderlizing Locke and Boone, when they were alone in the jungle with his kid.
More also? In a rather early episode, Locke is doing something (looks like he's tanning, or doing something similar to boar hide) on the beach, and he's using a child's shoe to dump sand on his project. A child's shoe only comes from a dead child. It creeped me right out. I keep getting sucked in by Locke, and thinking he's harmless, and good, and then he creeps me out, again.
Locke is a most interesting and complex character. I adored him last season. This season his arrogance is annoying me.
Also? I'm sorry she's dead.
Hey, I liked Shannon well enough. I think the actress was OK and the character was starting to get interesting. I supposed sex with Sayid will do that for a girl. As for Boone, I pretty much agree, because the actor creeped me out. But the character -- as a lackey for Locke -- would have been interesting if the passengers become antagonistic toward each other. Since they couldn't recast, I wasn't sorry to see Boone killed off as the first Survivor Who was Played by an Actor in the Opening Credits (Not Including the Pilot, who was Killed Off in the Pilot) or SWWPbaAitOC(NItPwwKOitP), for short.
What?
A child's shoe only comes from a dead child.
Or from a child's luggage, or from any of the debris that might have come off a kid before he got to it.
Yeah, but there aren't any kids (that they knew about) except Walt that survived. Thus, the original owner's dead, whether or not Locke saw the body.
I liked the kid shoe scene a lot. It was perfect Locke with a side of creepy.
Thus, the original owner's dead, whether or not Locke saw the body.
Lots of people died. They used a lot of their stuff. Why is this instance a problem?