Well, Traitor!guy said that Nathan "wasn't a good person" and that was why he wasn't on the list.

If he meant what he said, this could be interesting in that I'd be curious to know what the Others' think constitutes being a good person or not. Also, it makes me curious what Nathan was doing for two hours in the jungle.

Then again, maybe I DON'T want to know what he was off doing for two hours by himself. Ewww.

The whole "they took the able" theory is weird with Eko still around. Isn't he the biggest and the buffest and pretty damned useful?

he was, in fact, a traitor

I don't think he was a traitor - he was never on their side to betray them. He was an infiltrator, whose loyalties never swayed.

The whole "they took the able" theory is weird with Eko still around. Isn't he the biggest and the buffest and pretty damned useful?

I thought they tried and he killed two of them. Or are you talking after that point?

The whole "they took the able" theory is weird with Eko still around.

Well, he did kill the ones who tried to take him. If you believe what Goodwin was telling Ana, the first batch taken were the biggest and ablest, the threats. The second batch were the good ones (or nice ones, or something like that).

It bothered me, too, that Ana Lucia and the others went on so long about not seeing Nathan on the plane, but not one of them seemed to not remember seeing Goodwin on the plane. At that point, wouldn't you have been trying to place everyone?

Misdirects irritate me more and more lately. Why didn't Nathan argue? Wouldn't anyone who'd been thrown into a pit by his only companions yell his head off, giving any and all details of his life, anything to prove he was who he said he was?

And clearly he wasn't in on it with Goodwin, because there was no indication of that when Goodwin freed him. Before, you know, snapping his neck.

Or are you talking after that point?

After that point, I meant. They're all crazy creepy magical and stuff, and that looks like a huge failure on their part.

Amy, I'm with you on the misdirects. Some explanation of why he had to pee for hours might have been a start.

Some explanation of why he had to pee for hours might have been a start.

Exactly. Although, if he truly did...well, poor guy.

Some explanation of why he had to pee for hours might have been a start.

Yeah, an off-hand remark from Goodwin about how Nathan had found a stash of food or something that he was keeping to himself would have gone a long way towards explaining his behavior.

Then again, maybe I DON'T want to know what he was off doing for two hours by himself. Ewww.

Yeah, based on his defensiveness I though he might have headed off to engage in a bathroom activity that he'd have been more embarrassed to have an audience for.

Yeah, based on his defensiveness I though he might have headed off to engage in a bathroom activity that he'd have been more embarrassed to have an audience for.

"What are ya doing in there? Don't you know someone else needs to use that tree?"