juliebird,
thanks for the offer, I figured it out using google pages.
Okay folks, two things:
1) please do not make fun of the website. It is basic and has no style. :-)
2) please do not link this or distribute the file outside of this site.
Ready? [link]
OMG, like, that site has, like, no style and is
soooo
basic!
;)
Google is our friend (thanks to Willow for turning me on to it *g*)
thanks for getting that article up, now I'll be able to find out if I'm reading
waaay
too much into it.
I mean, I guess it lets the creators off the hook, but the end result is still a compromised show.
HA HA HA HA.
Okay, at least Damon Lindelof is entirely self-aware and capable of mocking his own show: check out how he would do an Office episode.
any reactions to the article?
I didn't think the network control sounded as bad in the article, as I expected, from what I read here. It sounds like ABC had the concept for the show, and hired the writers -- not that they pitched the show. There was a direction they wanted to go, that ABC didn't let them go, with the
Dave
episode, but I remember hearing about things like that with Mutant Enemy and their networks.
What stuck out, to you?
Okay, so looking at my message center and this freaked me out a bit:
Lost 2: Tied to a Tree in a Jungle of Mystery (2703 messages, 815 new)
Spooky.
Total loss. That seriously sucks.
Thank goodness no one was home at the time!