And the thing is, I like my evil like I like my men: evil. You know, straight up, black hat, tied to the train tracks, soon my electro-ray will destroy metropolis BAD.

Buffy ,'Sleeper'


Natter 40: The Nice One  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Connie Neil - Nov 28, 2005 7:17:41 am PST #7340 of 10006
brillig

she hid a few pieces from the puzzle I was doing at the time

True evil.


tommyrot - Nov 28, 2005 7:19:40 am PST #7341 of 10006
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

So I wouldn't use the word "gravity" lightly....

Heh.


Gudanov - Nov 28, 2005 7:20:14 am PST #7342 of 10006
Coding and Sleeping

I'm only at the very start, and am intrigued by the implication that the time dimension has something like gravity which pulls us in the one direction. Does that hold in actual science?

Nope. In fact the laws of physics tend to work the same forward and backward.


§ ita § - Nov 28, 2005 7:20:58 am PST #7343 of 10006
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

So I wouldn't use the word "gravity" lightly to describe such a force.

I just mean something akin to gravity, as we experience it right now. Pulling in one direction, something that must be fought against to go in a different direction.

I know the analogy falls apart, but I'd never stopped to wonder why does time just go forwards, and why so inexorably. Is there a lay-explanation for that?

The realisation that House is Holmesian has freed me from my urge to watch it, actually. I don't feel as encouraged to engage with Holmes, so I can read/watch/listen to those stories more easily than House, who really bothers me.

eta:

In fact the laws of physics tend to work the same forward and backward.

Like gravity?


Gudanov - Nov 28, 2005 7:24:03 am PST #7344 of 10006
Coding and Sleeping

I know the analogy falls apart, but I'd never stopped to wonder why does time just go forwards, and why so inexorably.

That is still a big question in physics. I just read about this, but I can't remember the particulars of a theory about why time has an arrow.


tommyrot - Nov 28, 2005 7:25:45 am PST #7345 of 10006
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

I just read about this, but I can't remember the particulars of a theory about why time has an arrow.

I think there's entropy involved... somewhere....

Then there's the theory that time is an illusion, as everything in the entire history of the universe has already happened. Fun.


Sue - Nov 28, 2005 7:27:30 am PST #7346 of 10006
hip deep in pie

So, Canadians, should be some fun times tonight, huh? God damn, I wish we had the no-con in the US.

Whooo! Most people are predicting some form of minority government, so we could be doing this again next year.

I am home sick today. I didn't think it was possible to sleep as much as I have slept in the last 24 hours.


Gudanov - Nov 28, 2005 7:30:41 am PST #7347 of 10006
Coding and Sleeping

I think there's entropy involved... somewhere....

Yep, it's in there.

Then there's the theory that time is an illusion, as everything in the entire history of the universe has already happened. Fun.

Certainly the concept of absolute time is an illusion. Since time is a part of the universe you can't really speak of universe having already happened, it just is and we're at a particular coordinate that has a location in both space and time.


Kate P. - Nov 28, 2005 7:30:55 am PST #7348 of 10006
That's the pain / That cuts a straight line down through the heart / We call it love

nsm relaxing as like a stay in Guantanamo

Heh. This is pretty much how I feel about knitting and crocheting and the like.


§ ita § - Nov 28, 2005 7:32:43 am PST #7349 of 10006
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Since time is a part of the universe you can't really speak of universe having already happened, it just is and we're at a particular coordinate that has a location in both space and time.

Come again? Are you saying that the concept of something happening simultaneously (or an hour and a half apart) on opposite sides of the universe is bollocks?

I don't see how that jibes with the ability to posit a coordinate system with time as an axis.